Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 741 - 750 of 1343 for shoe.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. with a shoe during the supervised portion of visitation. ¶9 On October 29, 2019, the State filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=526997 - 2022-06-01

State v. Anthony Liggins
he then took his tennis shoes and beat her in the back with them, and punched her in the right side
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2223 - 2005-03-31

WI App 59 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2012AP827-CR Complete Title ...
and asked the officer to shoot him. The officer took away Uhlenberg’s shoes and laces and told
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94722 - 2013-05-28

2006 WI APP 220
, the normal subrogation relationship, where the subrogee stands in the shoes of the subrogor, see Wilmot v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26524 - 2006-10-30

Lafayette County Department of Human Services v. Stephen J.C.
on the face with a shoe. Chelsea also said that the incidences of abuse occurred three to four times per week
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15192 - 2005-03-31

State v. Keith A. Franszczak
his police uniform and a pair of “low-cut running type/athletic shoes,” and his hands are bare
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3994 - 2005-03-31

Lafayette County Department of Human Services v. Stephen J.C.
on the face with a shoe. Chelsea also said that the incidences of abuse occurred three to four times per week
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2172 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] WI APP 220
in the shoes of the subrogor, see Wilmot v. Racine County, 136 Wis. 2d 57, 63, 400 N.W.2d 917 (1987), does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26524 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Mark Capistrant v. Froedtert Memorial Lutheran Hospital, Inc.
provider,” the Fund, like any entity providing insurance coverage, stands in the shoes of those to whom
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6016 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Fred H. Geiger, Jr. v. Wisconsin Health Care LiabilityInsurance Plan
care No. 95-0692-FT -6- providers. Here, WHCLIP and the Fund stand in the shoes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8754 - 2017-09-19