Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7481 - 7490 of 65036 for timed.
Search results 7481 - 7490 of 65036 for timed.
Douglas Niemann v. Steve Adler
on the grounds that the demand for trial was not filed within the statutory time limit of fifteen days
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13281 - 2005-03-31
on the grounds that the demand for trial was not filed within the statutory time limit of fifteen days
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13281 - 2005-03-31
State v. Gary Bryant
for the State's agreement to recommend a “time served” disposition. At the plea hearing and under oath, Bryant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12276 - 2005-03-31
for the State's agreement to recommend a “time served” disposition. At the plea hearing and under oath, Bryant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12276 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Victor M. Vences
hitting her over the head with an object that looked like a rock. By the time help arrived, Vences had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11791 - 2017-09-21
hitting her over the head with an object that looked like a rock. By the time help arrived, Vences had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11791 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Miles J. Laumann
malfunctioned 153 times from January 1, 1995, through May 26, 1998. Because the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14611 - 2017-09-21
malfunctioned 153 times from January 1, 1995, through May 26, 1998. Because the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14611 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
seven more hearings between February 11 and August 15, 2011. During this time, both parties began
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96352 - 2013-05-06
seven more hearings between February 11 and August 15, 2011. During this time, both parties began
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96352 - 2013-05-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
custody. However, the judgment also stated that, “[a]t such time as these no contact conditions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=312375 - 2020-12-10
custody. However, the judgment also stated that, “[a]t such time as these no contact conditions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=312375 - 2020-12-10
[PDF]
Edward G. Stolzman v. Mary A. Stolzman
. At the time of the divorce he was fifty-two and she was fifty-one. He was recovering from a kidney stone
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13884 - 2014-09-15
. At the time of the divorce he was fifty-two and she was fifty-one. He was recovering from a kidney stone
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13884 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
determine: (1) whether the defendant was “in custody” during the relevant time period; and (2) whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=876431 - 2024-11-19
determine: (1) whether the defendant was “in custody” during the relevant time period; and (2) whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=876431 - 2024-11-19
Patricia Laux v. County of Waupaca
, a Waupaca County employee who was driving a sanding truck at the time of the accident. The parties agreed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12495 - 2005-03-31
, a Waupaca County employee who was driving a sanding truck at the time of the accident. The parties agreed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12495 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Thomas L. Leck
the arresting officer's knowledge at the time of the arrest would lead a reasonable police officer to believe
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10119 - 2017-09-19
the arresting officer's knowledge at the time of the arrest would lead a reasonable police officer to believe
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10119 - 2017-09-19