Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7531 - 7540 of 41752 for new88v.net 💥🏹 new88 💥🏹 new 88 💥🏹 new88vnet 💥🏹 nha cai new88 💥🏹 new88v.net.

COURT OF APPEALS
sexual assault of the same child, and the order denying his motion for a new trial. Hawley argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49527 - 2010-05-04

[PDF] CA Blank Order
of the circuit court denying his new-factor sentence modification and reconsideration motions. Based upon our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=630159 - 2023-03-14

State v. J.B. Franklin, Jr.
in order to justify a hearing on his postconviction motion to modify his sentence based on a new factor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10145 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
for repeated sexual assault of the same child, and the order denying his motion for a new trial. Hawley
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49527 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
that his ineligibility for the ERP constituted a new factor. Specifically, Grubor asked that one of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103595 - 2013-10-29

[PDF] William T. Painter v. Ralph L. Zaun
. William T. Painter appeals from an order vacating a jury verdict and ordering a new trial.1 Ralph L
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10322 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
argues that two new factors warrant a reduction in the length of his sentence: (1) Zamber did not have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218838 - 2018-09-11

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
). No. 2013AP414-CR 4 ineligibility for the ERP constituted a new factor. Specifically, Grubor asked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103595 - 2017-09-21

William T. Painter v. Ralph L. Zaun
a jury verdict and ordering a new trial.[1] Ralph L. Zaun cross-appeals challenging the jury verdict
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10322 - 2005-03-31

State v. Gary L. Everts
was not a new factor warranting sentence modification in this case. The trial court further rejected Everts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18233 - 2005-05-24