Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7571 - 7580 of 84314 for simple case search/1000.

State v. William Remington
be as simple as a finger-to-nose or walk-a-straight-line test. Without such a test, the police officers could
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15715 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Isom Brumfield, Jr.
the attorneys whether a preliminary hearing even took place in this case. Second, there was no personal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13293 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
officer who has investigated numerous cases of intoxicated driving. See State v. Wille, 185 Wis. 2d 673
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36315 - 2009-04-29

[PDF] State v. James R. Coleman
are not relevant to the issues in this case. See 1995 Wis. Act 69, ยงยง 7, 8. No. 96-0159-CR -3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10258 - 2017-09-20

State v. Olayinka Kazeem Lagundoye
at 282, 564 N.W.2d at 760. Rather, Douangmala is a simple statutory construction case, applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5543 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Olayinka Kazeem Lagundoye
at 282, 564 N.W.2d at 760. Rather, Douangmala is a simple statutory construction case, applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5543 - 2017-09-19

State v. Olayinka Kazeem Lagundoye
at 282, 564 N.W.2d at 760. Rather, Douangmala is a simple statutory construction case, applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5545 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Olayinka Kazeem Lagundoye
at 282, 564 N.W.2d at 760. Rather, Douangmala is a simple statutory construction case, applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5545 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Olayinka Kazeem Lagundoye
at 282, 564 N.W.2d at 760. Rather, Douangmala is a simple statutory construction case, applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5544 - 2017-09-19

State v. Olayinka Kazeem Lagundoye
at 282, 564 N.W.2d at 760. Rather, Douangmala is a simple statutory construction case, applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5544 - 2005-03-31