Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 75991 - 76000 of 77531 for judgment for u s.
Search results 75991 - 76000 of 77531 for judgment for u s.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
IT IS ORDERED that the judgment and order are summarily affirmed. WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2011-12
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101898 - 2017-09-21
IT IS ORDERED that the judgment and order are summarily affirmed. WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2011-12
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101898 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Gerald D. Taylor
then filed a direct appeal to this court, again raising sentencing issues. We affirmed the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7102 - 2017-09-20
then filed a direct appeal to this court, again raising sentencing issues. We affirmed the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7102 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, and we summarily affirmed the judgment of conviction. State v. Goins, No. 2021AP150-CRNM, unpublished
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1128820 - 2026-06-11
, and we summarily affirmed the judgment of conviction. State v. Goins, No. 2021AP150-CRNM, unpublished
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1128820 - 2026-06-11
Brown County v. April O.
parental rights and entered judgment accordingly. This appeal followed. STANDARD OF REVIEW
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3420 - 2005-03-31
parental rights and entered judgment accordingly. This appeal followed. STANDARD OF REVIEW
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3420 - 2005-03-31
Louis Salimes v. Town of Caledonia Board of Police and Fire Commissioners
action was arbitrary, oppressive, or unreasonable and represented its will and not its judgment; and (4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9461 - 2005-03-31
action was arbitrary, oppressive, or unreasonable and represented its will and not its judgment; and (4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9461 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
was insufficient to support the conviction. We rejected Moffett’s argument and summarily affirmed the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121008 - 2014-09-09
was insufficient to support the conviction. We rejected Moffett’s argument and summarily affirmed the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121008 - 2014-09-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
fair judgment impossible.’” State v. Rodriguez, 2006 WI App 163, ¶36, 295 Wis. 2d 801, 722 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250048 - 2019-11-14
fair judgment impossible.’” State v. Rodriguez, 2006 WI App 163, ¶36, 295 Wis. 2d 801, 722 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250048 - 2019-11-14
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
that the judgment is summarily affirmed. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2009-10
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91597 - 2014-09-15
that the judgment is summarily affirmed. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2009-10
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91597 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. STAT. ch. 980 context, we may not substitute our judgment for that of the trier of fact unless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84949 - 2014-09-15
. STAT. ch. 980 context, we may not substitute our judgment for that of the trier of fact unless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84949 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
will and not its judgment; and (4) there was substantial evidence upon which the committee might reasonably make
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90908 - 2012-12-20
will and not its judgment; and (4) there was substantial evidence upon which the committee might reasonably make
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90908 - 2012-12-20