Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7601 - 7610 of 84254 for case number.

[PDF] FA-4139V; Financial Disclosure Statement
Petitioner B Name (First, Middle and Last) Enter the case number. This form must be filed
/formdisplay/FA-4139V.pdf?formNumber=FA-4139V&formType=Form&formatId=2&language=en - 2023-04-06

[PDF] Kay R. Wichman v. Robert J. Wichman
payer" under § HSS 80.02(25) and (28) because she did not meet the "threshold" number of 109.5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14863 - 2017-09-21

Kay R. Wichman v. Robert J. Wichman
the "threshold" number of 109.5 overnights per year.[2] As a result, the trial court ordered that Kay pay 25
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14863 - 2005-03-31

WI App 42 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2010AP3120 Complete Title of...
2012 WI App 42 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2010AP3120 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79598 - 2012-04-24

CA Blank Order
for postconviction relief. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93460 - 2013-03-05

CA Blank Order
supervision in case number 2012CF5558, to run consecutive to his revocation sentence. In case number
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144213 - 2015-07-06

[PDF] Wisconsin Supreme Court accepts no new cases April 9 conference
acted to deny review in a number of cases at its April 9, 2025 conference. The case numbers, counties
/supreme/docs/0525cal.pdf - 2025-05-02

[PDF] State v. David R. Bjerkaas
and therefore affirm. ¶2 In 1989 Bjerkaas received a four-year prisoner term in case number 88-CF-827
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16092 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
that were based on numbers of hours worked and hourly rates, not flat fees as in this case. See Kolupar v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=556756 - 2022-08-18

[PDF] Jamie P. Fritz v. Mid-States Footwear Corporation
. NO. 96-0681 3 identified by the parties as number two, because it has the most side clearance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10503 - 2017-09-20