Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7611 - 7620 of 62616 for child support.
Search results 7611 - 7620 of 62616 for child support.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of first-degree sexual assault of a child. See WIS. STAT. § 940.225(1)(d) (1985-86).1 He also appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=261624 - 2020-05-27
of first-degree sexual assault of a child. See WIS. STAT. § 940.225(1)(d) (1985-86).1 He also appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=261624 - 2020-05-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for one count of second-degree sexual assault of a child, contrary to No. 2012AP2515-CR 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101254 - 2017-09-21
for one count of second-degree sexual assault of a child, contrary to No. 2012AP2515-CR 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101254 - 2017-09-21
Racine County Human Services Department v. Timothy H.
constituted “child bargaining” contrary to public policy and the best interests of the children. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14299 - 2005-03-31
constituted “child bargaining” contrary to public policy and the best interests of the children. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14299 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of conviction for one count of second-degree sexual assault of a child, contrary to Wis. Stat. § 948.02(2) (2001
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101254 - 2013-08-26
of conviction for one count of second-degree sexual assault of a child, contrary to Wis. Stat. § 948.02(2) (2001
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101254 - 2013-08-26
State v. Luther Williams
of a child.[1] Williams argues that his right to confrontation was violated when the circuit court admitted
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16440 - 2005-03-31
of a child.[1] Williams argues that his right to confrontation was violated when the circuit court admitted
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16440 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Gary L. Retzlaff v. Betty A. Winters
year. From this amount, the trial court deducted $13,542 for child support and $39,000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13465 - 2017-09-21
year. From this amount, the trial court deducted $13,542 for child support and $39,000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13465 - 2017-09-21
Gary L. Retzlaff v. Betty A. Winters
. The court also awarded custody of the parties’ son to Gary, but did not require Betty to pay child support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13465 - 2005-03-31
. The court also awarded custody of the parties’ son to Gary, but did not require Betty to pay child support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13465 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
we conclude that Downs did not support his petition with evidence of his progress since the date
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95080 - 2014-09-15
we conclude that Downs did not support his petition with evidence of his progress since the date
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95080 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
hearing. Because we conclude that Downs did not support his petition with evidence of his progress since
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95080 - 2013-04-08
hearing. Because we conclude that Downs did not support his petition with evidence of his progress since
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95080 - 2013-04-08
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of one count of first-degree sexual assault of a child No. 2021AP926-CR 2 under age
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=654260 - 2023-05-09
of one count of first-degree sexual assault of a child No. 2021AP926-CR 2 under age
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=654260 - 2023-05-09