Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 76761 - 76770 of 84453 for simple case search.
Search results 76761 - 76770 of 84453 for simple case search.
[PDF]
Kathy Elrod v. Elroy Brommer
demonstrated no legally protected interest. Our supreme court has stated: Wisconsin case law indicates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3678 - 2017-09-19
demonstrated no legally protected interest. Our supreme court has stated: Wisconsin case law indicates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3678 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95649 - 2014-09-15
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95649 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
circumstances evidencing a gross and shocking misallocation, or in the case of demonstrated legal error
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68707 - 2011-07-27
circumstances evidencing a gross and shocking misallocation, or in the case of demonstrated legal error
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68707 - 2011-07-27
[PDF]
State v. Randall T. Riley
.2d at 700. In the landmark case, Whren v. United States, 517 U.S. 806 (1996), the Court held
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13537 - 2017-09-21
.2d at 700. In the landmark case, Whren v. United States, 517 U.S. 806 (1996), the Court held
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13537 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. David G. Grimm
. It is also noted that earlier in the proceedings Grimm had a lawyer representing him in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9124 - 2017-09-19
. It is also noted that earlier in the proceedings Grimm had a lawyer representing him in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9124 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
under the facts of this case, we affirm.2 ¶2 A defendant seeking modification based on a new factor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28069 - 2014-09-15
under the facts of this case, we affirm.2 ¶2 A defendant seeking modification based on a new factor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28069 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of this case. ¶8 Finally, Mejia argues that his sentence should be reduced to allow him to be deported
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=116919 - 2017-09-21
of this case. ¶8 Finally, Mejia argues that his sentence should be reduced to allow him to be deported
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=116919 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Leopoldo Pequeno
. In this case, Leopoldo Pequeno argues that the statute must be read to also require the State to prove
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6142 - 2017-09-19
. In this case, Leopoldo Pequeno argues that the statute must be read to also require the State to prove
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6142 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21(1) (2019-20
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=456636 - 2021-11-24
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21(1) (2019-20
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=456636 - 2021-11-24
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and placement. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186299 - 2017-09-21
and placement. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186299 - 2017-09-21