Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7761 - 7770 of 40447 for probate forms/1000.
Search results 7761 - 7770 of 40447 for probate forms/1000.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
as a condition of probation in Dane County. Hawley argues that the circuit court lacked authority to stay
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238212 - 2019-03-28
as a condition of probation in Dane County. Hawley argues that the circuit court lacked authority to stay
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238212 - 2019-03-28
[PDF]
John E. Prentice v. Calvary Memorial Church of Racine, Inc.
appeals from a probate court order allowing the claim of Calvary Memorial Church of Racine, Inc
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7305 - 2017-09-20
appeals from a probate court order allowing the claim of Calvary Memorial Church of Racine, Inc
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7305 - 2017-09-20
John E. Prentice v. Calvary Memorial Church of Racine, Inc.
a probate court order allowing the claim of Calvary Memorial Church of Racine, Inc. (Calvary) for specific
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7305 - 2005-03-31
a probate court order allowing the claim of Calvary Memorial Church of Racine, Inc. (Calvary) for specific
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7305 - 2005-03-31
State v. Bruce R. Polczynski
the circuit court may place Polczynski on probation under the statutes that were in effect at the time of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2601 - 2005-03-31
the circuit court may place Polczynski on probation under the statutes that were in effect at the time of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2601 - 2005-03-31
State v. David W. Oakley
] as a repeat offender, and from a postconviction order denying his challenge to his sentence and a probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16335 - 2005-03-31
] as a repeat offender, and from a postconviction order denying his challenge to his sentence and a probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16335 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
OWI Guidelines District 4 (effective June 1, 2018)
. = $21.50 $21.50 No Probation Court Support = $68.00 $68.00 Crime Lab = $13.00 $13.00 Forfeiture + Costs
/publications/fees/docs/d4owi2017-2.pdf - 2018-06-12
. = $21.50 $21.50 No Probation Court Support = $68.00 $68.00 Crime Lab = $13.00 $13.00 Forfeiture + Costs
/publications/fees/docs/d4owi2017-2.pdf - 2018-06-12
[PDF]
OWI Guidelines District 4 (effective December 1, 2018)
. = $21.50 $21.50 No Probation Court Support = $68.00 $68.00 Crime Lab = $13.00 $13.00 Forfeiture + Costs
/publications/fees/docs/d4owi2018.pdf - 2018-11-29
. = $21.50 $21.50 No Probation Court Support = $68.00 $68.00 Crime Lab = $13.00 $13.00 Forfeiture + Costs
/publications/fees/docs/d4owi2018.pdf - 2018-11-29
State v. James T. Fitzgerald
is whether Fitzgerald, as a probationer in custody under a probation hold, was a “prisoner” for purposes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14965 - 2005-03-31
is whether Fitzgerald, as a probationer in custody under a probation hold, was a “prisoner” for purposes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14965 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. James T. Fitzgerald
a probation hold, was a “prisoner” for purposes of the battery by a prisoner statute. Fitzgerald contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14965 - 2017-09-21
a probation hold, was a “prisoner” for purposes of the battery by a prisoner statute. Fitzgerald contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14965 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
),1 because he was serving a single term of probation as a disposition for Counts 1, 3, and 6. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66393 - 2014-09-15
),1 because he was serving a single term of probation as a disposition for Counts 1, 3, and 6. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66393 - 2014-09-15