Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 781 - 790 of 6307 for 208.

[PDF] Fariba Baylis v. State
. West, 181 Wis.2d 792, 796, 512 N.W.2d 207, 208 (Ct. App. 1993), we held that the bail condition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15486 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Donald Mentzel
plea withdrawal motion.” More recently, in State v. Thompson, 208 Wis.2d 253, 257-58, 559 N.W.2d 917
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12661 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Ethelyn C. Kloth v. Department of Health and Family Services
at the same conclusion as the ALJ. Daly v. Natural Res. Bd., 60 Wis. 2d 208, 219-20, 208 N.W.2d 839 (1978
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3108 - 2017-09-20

COURT OF APPEALS
, and conclude that we are bound by Nemetz. See Cook v. Cook, 208 Wis. 2d 166, 189-90, 560 N.W.2d 246 (1997). ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28587 - 2007-03-28

[PDF] State v. Kenyon H.
208 (Ct. App. 1991) (decided when the juvenile court was required to “give paramount consideration
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5351 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Jennifer Boucher v. North Memorial Medical Center
that intent by first examining the plain language of the statute. Anderson v. City of Milwaukee, 208 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14051 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Courtyard Condominium Association, Inc. v. Barbara Draper
. See Little Sissabagama Lake Shore Owners Ass’n, Inc. v. Town of Edgewater, 208 Wis. 2d 259, 264
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2771 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Robert L. Noll
the discretion of the supreme court. See Cook v. Cook, 208 Wis. 2d 166, 189-90, 560 N.W.2d 246 (1997
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4691 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Randal L. Bell v. Employers Mutual Casualty Company of Des Moines
). It is an erroneous exercise of discretion to apply the wrong legal standard. Beaupre v. Airriess, 208 Wis.2d 238
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11281 - 2017-09-19

State v. Paul J. Stuart
, the recantation testimony must be supported by other newly discovered evidence. State v. McCallum, 208 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3975 - 2005-03-31