Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7801 - 7810 of 68502 for did.
Search results 7801 - 7810 of 68502 for did.
COURT OF APPEALS
court did not erroneously exercise its sentencing discretion when it imposed Gallion’s sentence. ¶4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29207 - 2007-05-29
court did not erroneously exercise its sentencing discretion when it imposed Gallion’s sentence. ¶4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29207 - 2007-05-29
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
districts? Because they got divorced. Why did they get divorced? Now, one of the things that I have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=189455 - 2017-09-21
districts? Because they got divorced. Why did they get divorced? Now, one of the things that I have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=189455 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Rodney Calhoun
agreement. We affirm the convictions and the sentences because we conclude the State did not breach
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9760 - 2017-09-19
agreement. We affirm the convictions and the sentences because we conclude the State did not breach
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9760 - 2017-09-19
William T. Painter v. Ralph L. Zaun
because it did not offset Painter’s contributory negligence. Upon consideration of Zaun’s objection
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10322 - 2005-03-31
because it did not offset Painter’s contributory negligence. Upon consideration of Zaun’s objection
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10322 - 2005-03-31
State v. Timothy Zeilinger
on to stop Zeilinger did not establish reasonable suspicion to justify the stop leading to his arrest. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6104 - 2005-03-31
on to stop Zeilinger did not establish reasonable suspicion to justify the stop leading to his arrest. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6104 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
sample, Smith told Sutherland that he did not think he should take the test. Sutherland advised Smith
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28923 - 2007-05-07
sample, Smith told Sutherland that he did not think he should take the test. Sutherland advised Smith
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28923 - 2007-05-07
COURT OF APPEALS
. Importantly, though, Hernandez testified that several key events did not occur in the 2000 case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93293 - 2013-02-26
. Importantly, though, Hernandez testified that several key events did not occur in the 2000 case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93293 - 2013-02-26
Holly R. v. Joseph T.
that the trial court erred in terminating his parental rights because he did not consent to the termination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2663 - 2005-03-31
that the trial court erred in terminating his parental rights because he did not consent to the termination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2663 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
that the voice on the recording did not sound like Walker, and that if Attorney Westrick had allowed him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55693 - 2010-10-20
that the voice on the recording did not sound like Walker, and that if Attorney Westrick had allowed him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55693 - 2010-10-20
State v. James E. Ganey
. Because the trial court did not erroneously exercise its discretion in denying Ganey’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11984 - 2005-03-31
. Because the trial court did not erroneously exercise its discretion in denying Ganey’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11984 - 2005-03-31