Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 78271 - 78280 of 84398 for simple case search.
Search results 78271 - 78280 of 84398 for simple case search.
Darla J.S. v. Jesus G.
in which the issue of paternity was not contested or litigated. T.E.D. is similar to this case because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11927 - 2005-03-31
in which the issue of paternity was not contested or litigated. T.E.D. is similar to this case because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11927 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
and other submissions to determine whether the movant has made a prima facie case for judgment and, if so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92523 - 2013-02-06
and other submissions to determine whether the movant has made a prima facie case for judgment and, if so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92523 - 2013-02-06
State v. Steven C. Billiat
omitted). Billiat entered into a plea agreement with the prosecution in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13742 - 2005-03-31
omitted). Billiat entered into a plea agreement with the prosecution in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13742 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
based on facts in the record.” Richard J.D., 297 Wis. 2d 20, ¶12. ¶10 In this case, the factors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59079 - 2011-01-18
based on facts in the record.” Richard J.D., 297 Wis. 2d 20, ¶12. ¶10 In this case, the factors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59079 - 2011-01-18
Wildeck, Inc. v. Palmer Building Systems Corporation
, 208 Wis.2d 509, 515, 561 N.W.2d 332, 335 (Ct. App. 1997) (citation omitted). This case was tried
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13380 - 2005-03-31
, 208 Wis.2d 509, 515, 561 N.W.2d 332, 335 (Ct. App. 1997) (citation omitted). This case was tried
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13380 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
court’s granting of a default judgment in this case based upon the facts found by the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46065 - 2010-01-20
court’s granting of a default judgment in this case based upon the facts found by the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46065 - 2010-01-20
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21 (2011-12).[1] We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102956 - 2013-10-15
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21 (2011-12).[1] We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102956 - 2013-10-15
COURT OF APPEALS
Stokes agrees that the case depended on the credibility of the State’s three main witnesses, and contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34098 - 2008-09-24
Stokes agrees that the case depended on the credibility of the State’s three main witnesses, and contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34098 - 2008-09-24
COURT OF APPEALS
and enunciate the standards set out in the competency statutes. Id., ¶¶91, 97. In this case, the County failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99952 - 2013-07-30
and enunciate the standards set out in the competency statutes. Id., ¶¶91, 97. In this case, the County failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99952 - 2013-07-30
CA Blank Order
. A count of felony bail jumping and three charges from another case were dismissed and read in. The court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98374 - 2013-06-25
. A count of felony bail jumping and three charges from another case were dismissed and read in. The court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98374 - 2013-06-25