Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7841 - 7850 of 76705 for search which.
Search results 7841 - 7850 of 76705 for search which.
[MS WORD]
JD-1746: Dispositional Order - Protection or Services (Chapter 938)
No. A Petition has been filed with the Court. This dispositional hearing was held on [Date] , which
/formdisplay/JD-1746.doc?formNumber=JD-1746&formType=Form&formatId=1&language=en - 2024-01-08
No. A Petition has been filed with the Court. This dispositional hearing was held on [Date] , which
/formdisplay/JD-1746.doc?formNumber=JD-1746&formType=Form&formatId=1&language=en - 2024-01-08
[PDF]
JD-1745 Dispositional Order (Delinquent)
No. A Petition has been filed with the court. This dispositional hearing was held on [Date] , which
/formdisplay/JD-1745.pdf?formNumber=JD-1745&formType=Form&formatId=2&language=en - 2025-07-10
No. A Petition has been filed with the court. This dispositional hearing was held on [Date] , which
/formdisplay/JD-1745.pdf?formNumber=JD-1745&formType=Form&formatId=2&language=en - 2025-07-10
State v. Raymond Massie
. We reject his claims and affirm the judgment and the order. Massie was present when a search warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13922 - 2005-03-31
. We reject his claims and affirm the judgment and the order. Massie was present when a search warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13922 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of the vehicle in which Garrett was a passenger. We agree. Because the evidence should have been suppressed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38153 - 2009-07-22
of the vehicle in which Garrett was a passenger. We agree. Because the evidence should have been suppressed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38153 - 2009-07-22
COURT OF APPEALS
a previous incident in which Ali was alleged to have possessed several barrel keys. The State sought
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40355 - 2009-09-02
a previous incident in which Ali was alleged to have possessed several barrel keys. The State sought
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40355 - 2009-09-02
[PDF]
State v. Joseph D. Haas
lot was not a search or seizure and did not affect a privacy interest. ¶4 On appeal, Haas argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15952 - 2017-09-21
lot was not a search or seizure and did not affect a privacy interest. ¶4 On appeal, Haas argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15952 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Joseph D. Haas
lot was not a search or seizure and did not affect a privacy interest. ¶4 On appeal, Haas argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15954 - 2017-09-21
lot was not a search or seizure and did not affect a privacy interest. ¶4 On appeal, Haas argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15954 - 2017-09-21
State v. Joseph D. Haas
was not a search or seizure and did not affect a privacy interest. ¶4 On appeal, Haas argues that attaching
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15954 - 2005-03-31
was not a search or seizure and did not affect a privacy interest. ¶4 On appeal, Haas argues that attaching
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15954 - 2005-03-31
State v. Joseph D. Haas
was not a search or seizure and did not affect a privacy interest. ¶4 On appeal, Haas argues that attaching
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15955 - 2005-03-31
was not a search or seizure and did not affect a privacy interest. ¶4 On appeal, Haas argues that attaching
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15955 - 2005-03-31
State v. Joseph D. Haas
was not a search or seizure and did not affect a privacy interest. ¶4 On appeal, Haas argues that attaching
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15952 - 2005-03-31
was not a search or seizure and did not affect a privacy interest. ¶4 On appeal, Haas argues that attaching
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15952 - 2005-03-31