Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 78401 - 78410 of 87699 for affidavit of filing.
Search results 78401 - 78410 of 87699 for affidavit of filing.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for Jason Haffenbredl, has filed a no-merit report pursuant to WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32 (2011-12) 1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107850 - 2017-09-21
for Jason Haffenbredl, has filed a no-merit report pursuant to WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32 (2011-12) 1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107850 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
years of initial confinement and ten years of extended supervision. In 2019, Johnson filed his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=290796 - 2020-09-24
years of initial confinement and ten years of extended supervision. In 2019, Johnson filed his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=290796 - 2020-09-24
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
counsel for Martin Louis Gonzalez, filed a no-merit report pursuant to WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32 and Anders
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=979132 - 2025-07-09
counsel for Martin Louis Gonzalez, filed a no-merit report pursuant to WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32 and Anders
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=979132 - 2025-07-09
[PDF]
Ronald H. Krienke v. Town Board
A party may file with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10473 - 2017-09-20
A party may file with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10473 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. John Lee Griffin
NOTICE A party may file with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10064 - 2017-09-19
NOTICE A party may file with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10064 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
factually, and he has failed to file a reply brief responding to the arguments made in the respondent’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=657117 - 2023-05-18
factually, and he has failed to file a reply brief responding to the arguments made in the respondent’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=657117 - 2023-05-18
[PDF]
State v. Andrew R. Reynolds
NOTICE A party may file with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8071 - 2017-09-19
NOTICE A party may file with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8071 - 2017-09-19
CA Blank Order
. Counsel for Peter Heywood has filed a no-merit report concluding there is no arguable basis for Heywood
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104477 - 2013-11-18
. Counsel for Peter Heywood has filed a no-merit report concluding there is no arguable basis for Heywood
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104477 - 2013-11-18
Peter J. Whiteman v. Kim M. Epps
, 1996 NOTICE A party may file with the Supreme Court a petition to review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8320 - 2005-03-31
, 1996 NOTICE A party may file with the Supreme Court a petition to review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8320 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
of one count of burglary, as a party to a crime. Joseph E. Redding, Esq., filed a no-merit report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95073 - 2013-04-02
of one count of burglary, as a party to a crime. Joseph E. Redding, Esq., filed a no-merit report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95073 - 2013-04-02