Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 78651 - 78660 of 82549 for simple case.
Search results 78651 - 78660 of 82549 for simple case.
[PDF]
State v. Robert A. Evans
as the decision is rationally based on the facts of the case and the applicable law.”). Insofar as Evans
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7046 - 2017-09-20
as the decision is rationally based on the facts of the case and the applicable law.”). Insofar as Evans
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7046 - 2017-09-20
State v. Leon J. Lace
judge even approaches expressing an opinion about either Lace or the merits of the State’s case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19446 - 2005-08-29
judge even approaches expressing an opinion about either Lace or the merits of the State’s case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19446 - 2005-08-29
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
not present “the clearest case for reasonable suspicion to conduct field sobriety tests,” the State had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204111 - 2017-11-30
not present “the clearest case for reasonable suspicion to conduct field sobriety tests,” the State had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204111 - 2017-11-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of acts. The case law does not permit such speculation. ¶29 Turning specifically to the testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=888389 - 2024-12-12
of acts. The case law does not permit such speculation. ¶29 Turning specifically to the testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=888389 - 2024-12-12
[PDF]
Christina Lynn Redfearn v. William Dennis Redfearn
is there anything in the Trial Court’s decision or in case law explaining why a twelve year marriage would justify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3799 - 2017-09-20
is there anything in the Trial Court’s decision or in case law explaining why a twelve year marriage would justify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3799 - 2017-09-20
Ronald J. Howe v. Neenah Springs, Inc.
regarding royalties for water distributed before March 1, 1999, and that, in any case, the doctrine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5385 - 2005-03-31
regarding royalties for water distributed before March 1, 1999, and that, in any case, the doctrine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5385 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, ¶19. ¶33 In this case, the circuit court rejected as “completely incredible” Smiley’s testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=865691 - 2024-10-22
, ¶19. ¶33 In this case, the circuit court rejected as “completely incredible” Smiley’s testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=865691 - 2024-10-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to issue its decision within thirty days after the filing of the reply brief. In case no. 2012AP1984
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94713 - 2014-09-15
to issue its decision within thirty days after the filing of the reply brief. In case no. 2012AP1984
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94713 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
observed, the DNA evidence in this case was “damning.” At trial, DNA analyst Lisa Treffinger testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=560077 - 2022-08-30
observed, the DNA evidence in this case was “damning.” At trial, DNA analyst Lisa Treffinger testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=560077 - 2022-08-30
COURT OF APPEALS
of the hearing, attorney Veternick stated he had “taken a re-look” at the case and had recommendations that went
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=124615 - 2014-10-20
of the hearing, attorney Veternick stated he had “taken a re-look” at the case and had recommendations that went
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=124615 - 2014-10-20