Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7871 - 7880 of 63731 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 7871 - 7880 of 63731 for Motion for joint custody.
Milwaukee County v. Louise M.
, 130 (Ct. App. 1992). Neither Louise M. nor Theodore S. are now in custody. Thus, whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8577 - 2005-03-31
, 130 (Ct. App. 1992). Neither Louise M. nor Theodore S. are now in custody. Thus, whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8577 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
to raise defenses to the charge and to pursue motions. The circuit court described the elements of third
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95629 - 2013-04-15
to raise defenses to the charge and to pursue motions. The circuit court described the elements of third
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95629 - 2013-04-15
COURT OF APPEALS
Linderman then filed a motion to modify his sentence or, in the alternative, to withdraw his guilty plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=69580 - 2011-08-15
Linderman then filed a motion to modify his sentence or, in the alternative, to withdraw his guilty plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=69580 - 2011-08-15
Milwaukee County v. Theodore S.
, 130 (Ct. App. 1992). Neither Louise M. nor Theodore S. are now in custody. Thus, whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8578 - 2005-03-31
, 130 (Ct. App. 1992). Neither Louise M. nor Theodore S. are now in custody. Thus, whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8578 - 2005-03-31
State v. Terry T.
B felony, that he posed a danger to the public and that he required restrictive custodial treatment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4317 - 2005-03-31
B felony, that he posed a danger to the public and that he required restrictive custodial treatment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4317 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Terry T.
custodial treatment. The court issued an order for change of placement and extension, recommending
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4317 - 2017-09-19
custodial treatment. The court issued an order for change of placement and extension, recommending
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4317 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
improperly commented on his silence. The court denied Plum’s motion, reasoning Plum was not in custody when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73098 - 2011-10-31
improperly commented on his silence. The court denied Plum’s motion, reasoning Plum was not in custody when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73098 - 2011-10-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
19, 2006, the court held an emergency custody hearing at which time, the County filed a petition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31498 - 2014-09-15
19, 2006, the court held an emergency custody hearing at which time, the County filed a petition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31498 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Case of the month - April 2010
in custody and unable to gain access to his vehicle, the search of the vehicle incident-to-arrest doctrine
/courts/resources/teacher/casemonth/docs/april10.pdf - 2010-04-08
in custody and unable to gain access to his vehicle, the search of the vehicle incident-to-arrest doctrine
/courts/resources/teacher/casemonth/docs/april10.pdf - 2010-04-08
Frontsheet
contractor assessor for the collection, maintenance, and custody of its property assessment records
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33183 - 2008-06-24
contractor assessor for the collection, maintenance, and custody of its property assessment records
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33183 - 2008-06-24