Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7881 - 7890 of 9145 for jurors.

[PDF] NOTICE
presume jurors follow their instructions. See State v. Gary M.B., 2004 WI 33, ¶33, 270 Wis. 2d 62, 676
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=40458 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Terrance C. Harris
that he “was denied the insight and perceptions of the co-defendant and his attorney to jurors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13441 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
. It is axiomatic that jurors are not bound to accept an expert’s opinion. Moreover, in a case like
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65230 - 2011-06-01

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. We presume that jurors follow instructions. See State v. LaCount, 2008 WI 59, ¶23, 310 Wis. 2d 85
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=482622 - 2022-02-15

[PDF] Paul C. Burch v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
of all substantive instructions, including Wis JI—Civil 1021, were given to jurors for their use during
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16906 - 2017-09-21

State v. Dennis L. Farr
as they were told—contrary to the directions of their employer. The jurors could conclude, as they obviously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11376 - 2005-03-31

State v. Michael Evans
of the defendant. In regard to the line[]up, the jurors were further given a false impression of its accuracy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2677 - 2005-03-31

Walworth County Department of Health & Human Services v. Patricia H.
the jury: Now, jurors, I have taken judicial notice of certain facts. Now, the express judicial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4623 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
statements through the detective. This was a proper credibility determination for the jurors to decide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29133 - 2007-06-26

State v. Rodobaldo C. Pozo
conclusions about human behavior; jurors as factfinders are permitted to do the same--and so are law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8637 - 2005-03-31