Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 791 - 800 of 65039 for timed.
Search results 791 - 800 of 65039 for timed.
[PDF]
WI App 13
million in fees for time spent litigating their fee petition. In contrast, Candace Bettendorf
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44865 - 2014-09-15
million in fees for time spent litigating their fee petition. In contrast, Candace Bettendorf
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44865 - 2014-09-15
2010 WI App 13
attorneys $1.25 million in fees for time spent litigating their fee petition. In contrast, Candace
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44865 - 2010-01-26
attorneys $1.25 million in fees for time spent litigating their fee petition. In contrast, Candace
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44865 - 2010-01-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
time so that release would not depreciate the seriousness of the offense; (c) Demonstrated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131864 - 2017-09-21
time so that release would not depreciate the seriousness of the offense; (c) Demonstrated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131864 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
La Crosse County DHS v. Sharon P.
necessary pretrial discovery. The fact-finding hearing was not scheduled at this time. The guardian ad
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20574 - 2017-09-21
necessary pretrial discovery. The fact-finding hearing was not scheduled at this time. The guardian ad
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20574 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
. We conclude that during the time period for which he seeks credit, Baker was in custody serving
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35512 - 2014-09-15
. We conclude that during the time period for which he seeks credit, Baker was in custody serving
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35512 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
extraordinary did not justify its failure to file a timely answer. We affirm the judgment of the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74597 - 2011-12-06
extraordinary did not justify its failure to file a timely answer. We affirm the judgment of the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74597 - 2011-12-06
COURT OF APPEALS
-eligible under s. 304.06, Stats., and s. PAC 1.05; (b) Served sufficient time so that release would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131864 - 2014-12-22
-eligible under s. 304.06, Stats., and s. PAC 1.05; (b) Served sufficient time so that release would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131864 - 2014-12-22
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to the instant case for time he served under supervision within the Department of Intensive Sanctions (DIS
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=502086 - 2022-03-31
to the instant case for time he served under supervision within the Department of Intensive Sanctions (DIS
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=502086 - 2022-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
) that set the time of his reincarceration after his supervision was revoked. The court then affirmed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=230790 - 2018-12-19
) that set the time of his reincarceration after his supervision was revoked. The court then affirmed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=230790 - 2018-12-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that Integrity argues were extraordinary did not justify its failure to file a timely answer. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74597 - 2014-09-15
that Integrity argues were extraordinary did not justify its failure to file a timely answer. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74597 - 2014-09-15