Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 79781 - 79790 of 84178 for simple case search.
Search results 79781 - 79790 of 84178 for simple case search.
COURT OF APPEALS
. Before Neubauer, P.J., Reilly and Gundrum, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. In this breach-of-contract case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104706 - 2013-11-26
. Before Neubauer, P.J., Reilly and Gundrum, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. In this breach-of-contract case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104706 - 2013-11-26
COURT OF APPEALS
not ignore evidence in this case. After consideration of numerous facts, the circuit court found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73910 - 2011-11-14
not ignore evidence in this case. After consideration of numerous facts, the circuit court found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73910 - 2011-11-14
[PDF]
State v. Ricky L. Thom
during the State's case-in- chief because there was no pre-examination stipulation as required by State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8783 - 2017-09-19
during the State's case-in- chief because there was no pre-examination stipulation as required by State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8783 - 2017-09-19
State v. Anthony Mitchell
court’s determination that there was no new factor in this case. ¶8 Mitchell also contends that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2646 - 2005-03-31
court’s determination that there was no new factor in this case. ¶8 Mitchell also contends that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2646 - 2005-03-31
State v. James Gulley
simultaneously awaiting trial and sentencing on charges in two separate cases for which concurrent sentences were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15237 - 2005-03-31
simultaneously awaiting trial and sentencing on charges in two separate cases for which concurrent sentences were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15237 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=656577 - 2023-05-16
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=656577 - 2023-05-16
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
partially prevailed in his last appellate case. We do, however, renew our warning to Prude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105382 - 2017-09-21
partially prevailed in his last appellate case. We do, however, renew our warning to Prude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105382 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2017-18).1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=305616 - 2020-11-19
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2017-18).1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=305616 - 2020-11-19
COURT OF APPEALS
. Findings of fact include “the circumstances of the case and the counsel’s conduct and strategy.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50322 - 2010-05-25
. Findings of fact include “the circumstances of the case and the counsel’s conduct and strategy.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50322 - 2010-05-25
State v. John C. Jackson
at 191. In the instant case, Officer Martin testified that, when he first saw
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13455 - 2005-03-31
at 191. In the instant case, Officer Martin testified that, when he first saw
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13455 - 2005-03-31