Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 801 - 810 of 63677 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 801 - 810 of 63677 for Motion for joint custody.
Timothy S. v. Lisa S.
for good cause. In October, a judgment of divorce awarded Lisa and Timothy joint legal custody of Zachary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18253 - 2005-05-23
for good cause. In October, a judgment of divorce awarded Lisa and Timothy joint legal custody of Zachary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18253 - 2005-05-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and addresses whether a suppression motion should have been filed and whether there is any basis to challenge
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=609460 - 2023-01-10
and addresses whether a suppression motion should have been filed and whether there is any basis to challenge
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=609460 - 2023-01-10
[PDF]
Arlene Arnold v. David Arnold
Anderson, P.J., Brown and Nettesheim, JJ. ΒΆ1 BROWN, J. David Arnold appeals from a custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6578 - 2017-09-19
Anderson, P.J., Brown and Nettesheim, JJ. ΒΆ1 BROWN, J. David Arnold appeals from a custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6578 - 2017-09-19
Arlene Arnold v. David Arnold
of legal custody, there is no provision establishing a presumption of joint placement. Keller, 256 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6578 - 2005-03-31
of legal custody, there is no provision establishing a presumption of joint placement. Keller, 256 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6578 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Charlotte Gadzinski v. Gerald Gadzinski
awarded joint legal custody of their teenaged daughter, who resided primarily with Gerald. At the time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8447 - 2017-09-19
awarded joint legal custody of their teenaged daughter, who resided primarily with Gerald. At the time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8447 - 2017-09-19
David L. Nichols v. Colleen R. Omann
in December 1988. The parties were awarded joint custody of their three minor children and Colleen received
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11597 - 2005-03-31
in December 1988. The parties were awarded joint custody of their three minor children and Colleen received
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11597 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
David L. Nichols v. Colleen R. Omann
in December 1988. The parties were awarded joint custody of their three minor children and Colleen received
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11597 - 2017-09-19
in December 1988. The parties were awarded joint custody of their three minor children and Colleen received
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11597 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
WI APP 23
. The same is true of a parent who does not have joint legal custody, but does have a right to physical
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45600 - 2014-09-15
. The same is true of a parent who does not have joint legal custody, but does have a right to physical
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45600 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
at the time of the divorce. Kis and Kim agreed to be awarded joint legal custody and shared placement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=878695 - 2024-11-20
at the time of the divorce. Kis and Kim agreed to be awarded joint legal custody and shared placement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=878695 - 2024-11-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
at the time of the divorce. Kis and Kim agreed to be awarded joint legal custody and shared placement
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=878695 - 2024-11-20
at the time of the divorce. Kis and Kim agreed to be awarded joint legal custody and shared placement
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=878695 - 2024-11-20