Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8001 - 8010 of 29429 for er.
Search results 8001 - 8010 of 29429 for er.
State v. Joseph P.
that the trial court erred when it admitted testimony of two DOC psychologists who treated and evaluated him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9675 - 2005-03-31
that the trial court erred when it admitted testimony of two DOC psychologists who treated and evaluated him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9675 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
and the Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage District.1 Dionne contends that the circuit court erred because it claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29708 - 2014-09-15
and the Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage District.1 Dionne contends that the circuit court erred because it claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29708 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
his presentence motion for plea withdrawal. He also argues the court erred by denying that motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=227050 - 2018-11-13
his presentence motion for plea withdrawal. He also argues the court erred by denying that motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=227050 - 2018-11-13
[PDF]
State v. Antonio Manns
hearing. He also argues that the trial court erred in allowing “other crimes” evidence. We affirm. I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9915 - 2017-09-19
hearing. He also argues that the trial court erred in allowing “other crimes” evidence. We affirm. I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9915 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
erred by granting Thatcher’s suppression motions and by denying the State’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=619585 - 2023-02-07
erred by granting Thatcher’s suppression motions and by denying the State’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=619585 - 2023-02-07
[PDF]
State v. Tony J. Gray
his due process rights. Next, Gray argues that the trial court erred when it ruled two of four
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3233 - 2017-09-19
his due process rights. Next, Gray argues that the trial court erred when it ruled two of four
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3233 - 2017-09-19
State v. Robert E. Tucker
)(a) and 939.05 (1999–2000).[1] He argues that the trial court erred when it denied his motion to suppress two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4730 - 2005-03-31
)(a) and 939.05 (1999–2000).[1] He argues that the trial court erred when it denied his motion to suppress two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4730 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Michael J. McClelland
McClelland contends that the trial court erred in both of its rulings. He argues that, under the totality
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6783 - 2017-09-20
McClelland contends that the trial court erred in both of its rulings. He argues that, under the totality
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6783 - 2017-09-20
State v. Frederick Wright
court erred because: (1) Wright’s counsel was ineffective; (2) the trial court erroneously admitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11388 - 2005-03-31
court erred because: (1) Wright’s counsel was ineffective; (2) the trial court erroneously admitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11388 - 2005-03-31
State v. Richard J. Kenyon
% of the pension plan withheld for the IRS). ANALYSIS Kenyon argues the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14040 - 2005-03-31
% of the pension plan withheld for the IRS). ANALYSIS Kenyon argues the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14040 - 2005-03-31