Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 80001 - 80010 of 94246 for the law on sleep and all cases.

[PDF] Rufus West v. Gary McCaughtry
evidence, whether or not it would be admissible in a court of law ….”). West seems to argue, as well
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10944 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
discretion. As a matter of law, rehabilitative efforts cannot be new factors entitling a defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49324 - 2010-04-26

Florence County v. Brad Richtig
after approaching the school bus from the opposite direction. Richtig and one passenger testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13484 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Jason T. Procknow
constitutes a new factor. ¶3 Whether a set of facts is a new factor is a question of law that this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7559 - 2017-09-19

State v. Robert Krist Johnson
supports the search is a question of law. See State v. Richardson, 156 Wis.2d 128, 137, 456 N.W.2d 830
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14879 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Florence County v. Brad Richtig
that Richtig stopped after approaching the school bus from the opposite direction. Richtig and one passenger
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13484 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Willie T. Durham
of law since the material facts are undisputed. See State v. Guzy, 139 Wis.2d 663, 671, 407 N.W.2d 548
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15126 - 2017-09-21

State v. Michael Davis
and the conviction, is so insufficient in probative value and force that it can be said as a matter of law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9743 - 2005-03-31

State v. Robert Daniel Ryan
to eight years in prison. We affirm. Ryan was charged with one count of burglary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9023 - 2005-03-31

State v. Donald Joseph Hall
of law that no trier of fact, acting reasonably, could have found guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11259 - 2005-03-31