Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 80181 - 80190 of 82545 for simple case.
Search results 80181 - 80190 of 82545 for simple case.
[PDF]
NOTICE
“to dismiss the … case or modify his consecutive (present sentence) to run concurrent with time served
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29892 - 2014-09-15
“to dismiss the … case or modify his consecutive (present sentence) to run concurrent with time served
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29892 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
pretrial conference, the case was assigned to a different judge and D.C. was represented by new counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204073 - 2017-11-30
pretrial conference, the case was assigned to a different judge and D.C. was represented by new counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204073 - 2017-11-30
Patricia A. Leider v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
of Leider's entitlement to worker's compensation has been made by LIRC in this case. [6] LIRC argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8183 - 2005-03-31
of Leider's entitlement to worker's compensation has been made by LIRC in this case. [6] LIRC argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8183 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
a party’s legal arguments rather than addressing the merits of the underlying case. ¶12 Antwuan asserts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136565 - 2015-03-04
a party’s legal arguments rather than addressing the merits of the underlying case. ¶12 Antwuan asserts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136565 - 2015-03-04
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
is presumptively not unduly harsh. See id., ¶32. We cannot say that the sentence imposed in this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140099 - 2017-09-21
is presumptively not unduly harsh. See id., ¶32. We cannot say that the sentence imposed in this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140099 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
the circumstances of the case. See id.; see also Bethards v. 3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60990 - 2014-09-15
the circumstances of the case. See id.; see also Bethards v. 3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60990 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Robert J. Maziarka v. Nancy Dolce
“that the court looked to and considered the facts of the case and reasoned its way to a conclusion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11494 - 2017-09-19
“that the court looked to and considered the facts of the case and reasoned its way to a conclusion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11494 - 2017-09-19
State v. Frank Starich
of .10 or above accompanied the primary charge in this case. It did not result in a separate conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3041 - 2005-03-31
of .10 or above accompanied the primary charge in this case. It did not result in a separate conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3041 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
in cases of multiple convictions are to run concurrently or consecutively, using the same factors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33618 - 2009-03-02
in cases of multiple convictions are to run concurrently or consecutively, using the same factors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33618 - 2009-03-02
State v. Edward J. Heuer
was originally scheduled in this case for April 2, 2001, well within the 180-day time limit. However, on March
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7275 - 2005-03-31
was originally scheduled in this case for April 2, 2001, well within the 180-day time limit. However, on March
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7275 - 2005-03-31