Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8061 - 8070 of 12891 for prosecuting.
Search results 8061 - 8070 of 12891 for prosecuting.
[PDF]
State v. Melvin E. Vance
supposed witness who did not possess a clear motive to lie or curry favor with the prosecution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7026 - 2017-09-20
supposed witness who did not possess a clear motive to lie or curry favor with the prosecution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7026 - 2017-09-20
State v. Derrick C. Evans
Evans nor the prosecution informed the trial judge of the memo at the plea/sentencing hearing. Evans
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8108 - 2005-03-31
Evans nor the prosecution informed the trial judge of the memo at the plea/sentencing hearing. Evans
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8108 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
-prosecution rulings by rote.” Davis asserts that counsel testified “how he was always over to Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74931 - 2011-12-13
-prosecution rulings by rote.” Davis asserts that counsel testified “how he was always over to Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74931 - 2011-12-13
[PDF]
State v. Duane R. Bull
required her to have sexual relations with Bull. Bull was prosecuted in both Dane and Columbia counties
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11558 - 2017-09-19
required her to have sexual relations with Bull. Bull was prosecuted in both Dane and Columbia counties
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11558 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Sylvester Neasman
on the suppression motions and the prosecution would have dropped the case. ¶6 In order to establish ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4324 - 2017-09-19
on the suppression motions and the prosecution would have dropped the case. ¶6 In order to establish ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4324 - 2017-09-19
State v. Christopher D. Brown
—Prosecution Function and Defense Function, Standard 3‑5.8 (3d ed. 1993), provides: Standard 3-5.8 Argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25946 - 2006-08-29
—Prosecution Function and Defense Function, Standard 3‑5.8 (3d ed. 1993), provides: Standard 3-5.8 Argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25946 - 2006-08-29
State v. John Robert Rybka
burglary prosecution, the potential prejudice produced by a reference to an earlier intra-family attempted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16319 - 2005-03-31
burglary prosecution, the potential prejudice produced by a reference to an earlier intra-family attempted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16319 - 2005-03-31
State v. Christopher Dilworth
speaking, the prosecution may not use a defendant’s statements stemming from custodial interrogation unless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18176 - 2005-05-16
speaking, the prosecution may not use a defendant’s statements stemming from custodial interrogation unless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18176 - 2005-05-16
CA Blank Order
, unless the prosecution would be substantially prejudiced.” State v. Jenkins, 2007 WI 96, ¶28, 303 Wis
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113846 - 2014-06-10
, unless the prosecution would be substantially prejudiced.” State v. Jenkins, 2007 WI 96, ¶28, 303 Wis
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113846 - 2014-06-10
State v. James C. Berlin
. The burden to present this proof is on the prosecution. Id. at 558, 419 N.W.2d at 239. However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9373 - 2005-03-31
. The burden to present this proof is on the prosecution. Id. at 558, 419 N.W.2d at 239. However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9373 - 2005-03-31