Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 80771 - 80780 of 84168 for simple case search.
Search results 80771 - 80780 of 84168 for simple case search.
State v. Martin M. Dudek
the refusal; the OWI case remains pending. Discussion ¶5 The sole appellate issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26240 - 2006-08-22
the refusal; the OWI case remains pending. Discussion ¶5 The sole appellate issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26240 - 2006-08-22
COURT OF APPEALS
.” Dillon adds that “[t]his evidence supported the State’s case and the jury’s verdict on the charge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143653 - 2015-06-29
.” Dillon adds that “[t]his evidence supported the State’s case and the jury’s verdict on the charge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143653 - 2015-06-29
COURT OF APPEALS
. This case arises from an ownership dispute over an approximately 3.13-acre, L-shaped parcel located along
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43475 - 2009-11-16
. This case arises from an ownership dispute over an approximately 3.13-acre, L-shaped parcel located along
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43475 - 2009-11-16
State v. Robert K.
and the interest of the public in the prompt disposition of cases. Robert K. did not object to the March 8, 2004
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7641 - 2005-03-31
and the interest of the public in the prompt disposition of cases. Robert K. did not object to the March 8, 2004
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7641 - 2005-03-31
Robert Kreuter v. City of Franklin
amounts shall be paid by the City to [Kreuter and Yunker], or [the Datka Estate] as the case may be, upon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7978 - 2005-03-31
amounts shall be paid by the City to [Kreuter and Yunker], or [the Datka Estate] as the case may be, upon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7978 - 2005-03-31
State v. Maurice Simmons
in a previous case. The court recalled that Simmons and Kostich had talked for “an extensive period of time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18374 - 2005-06-06
in a previous case. The court recalled that Simmons and Kostich had talked for “an extensive period of time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18374 - 2005-06-06
State of Arizona v. Brian L. Nowak
to State of Arizona's motion to reopen the foreign case. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that respondent's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9967 - 2005-03-31
to State of Arizona's motion to reopen the foreign case. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that respondent's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9967 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 8, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court of...
the law”). ¶13 We question whether, under the facts of this case, the arresting officer’s statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28346 - 2007-03-07
the law”). ¶13 We question whether, under the facts of this case, the arresting officer’s statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28346 - 2007-03-07
_WISCONSIN COURT OF APPEALS
judicata, collateral estoppel or law of the case. Docket No. Title
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31827 - 2008-02-11
judicata, collateral estoppel or law of the case. Docket No. Title
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31827 - 2008-02-11
State v. Da Vang
to discharge Miller from the case. ¶4 By order dated November 17, 1998, we discharged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7530 - 2005-03-31
to discharge Miller from the case. ¶4 By order dated November 17, 1998, we discharged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7530 - 2005-03-31