Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8081 - 8090 of 29978 for consulta de causas.
Search results 8081 - 8090 of 29978 for consulta de causas.
State v. Alexander Dejesus
reviews de novo. Id. WAS THERE A SEIZURE? Both the Fourth Amendment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9707 - 2005-03-31
reviews de novo. Id. WAS THERE A SEIZURE? Both the Fourth Amendment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9707 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a sufficient reason for failing to bring available claims earlier is a question of law” that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1041687 - 2025-11-25
a sufficient reason for failing to bring available claims earlier is a question of law” that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1041687 - 2025-11-25
COURT OF APPEALS
attorney, and their cases were heard at the same time. Harvey and Gretzlock subsequently requested de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36472 - 2009-05-11
attorney, and their cases were heard at the same time. Harvey and Gretzlock subsequently requested de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36472 - 2009-05-11
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the verdict is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Smith, 2012 WI 91, ¶24, 342 Wis. 2d
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=183379 - 2017-09-21
the verdict is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Smith, 2012 WI 91, ¶24, 342 Wis. 2d
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=183379 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is subject to de novo review. See Borchardt v. Wilk, 156 Wis. 2d 420, 427, 456 N.W.2d 653 (Ct. App. 1990
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87699 - 2014-09-15
is subject to de novo review. See Borchardt v. Wilk, 156 Wis. 2d 420, 427, 456 N.W.2d 653 (Ct. App. 1990
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87699 - 2014-09-15
State v. Kenneth Moffett
deficient representation is a question of law, however, which this court reviews de novo. Id. ¶6 We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5200 - 2005-03-31
deficient representation is a question of law, however, which this court reviews de novo. Id. ¶6 We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5200 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
court case). SUFFICIENCY OF THE COMPLAINT ¶7 We review the sufficiency of a complaint de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32256 - 2008-03-26
court case). SUFFICIENCY OF THE COMPLAINT ¶7 We review the sufficiency of a complaint de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32256 - 2008-03-26
State v. Peter D. Wicker
had heroin in it. We agree with the trial court’s assessment that the de minimis conflict
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20040 - 2005-10-24
had heroin in it. We agree with the trial court’s assessment that the de minimis conflict
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20040 - 2005-10-24
COURT OF APPEALS
of law reviewed de novo by this court. See State v. Gavigan, 122 Wis. 2d 389, 391, 362 N.W.2d 162 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54236 - 2010-09-08
of law reviewed de novo by this court. See State v. Gavigan, 122 Wis. 2d 389, 391, 362 N.W.2d 162 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54236 - 2010-09-08
State v. Ryan Ross
of reasonableness is a question of law, which [this court] review[s] de novo.” State v. Young, 212 Wis. 2d 417, 424
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4079 - 2005-03-31
of reasonableness is a question of law, which [this court] review[s] de novo.” State v. Young, 212 Wis. 2d 417, 424
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4079 - 2005-03-31