Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8161 - 8170 of 31169 for WA 0852 2611 9277 RAB Interior Kamar Nuansa Coklat Apartemen Casa de Parco Tangerang.

State v. Stanley E. Young
Determining the statutory elements of a crime is a question of law; therefore, our review is de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3355 - 2005-03-31

Urban A. Hubert, Jr. v. Gary R. McCaughtry
Gerber in an unrelated incident. See Merritt v. De Los Santos, 721 F.2d 598, 601 (7th Cir. 1983
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12157 - 2005-03-31

State v. Eddie M. Miller
such questions de novo, without giving deference to the trial court's ruling. In re T.L., 151 Wis.2d 725, 730-31
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10419 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Steven P. Syrjala
the trial court’s findings of fact unless clearly erroneous, WIS. STAT. § 805.17(2), but we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7510 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
for a Qualified Domestic Relations Order. On de novo review, the circuit court overturned the FCC’s decision
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96557 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Grant County: ROBERT P. VAN DE HEY, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106464 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Wua Xiong
the defendant has shown the existence of a new factor is a question of law we decide de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13036 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
presents a question of law that we review de novo, whether and to what degree a sentence should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194918 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law we review de novo. See State v. Tolefree, 209 Wis. 2d 421, 424, 563 N.W.2d 175, 176 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105358 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Daniel J. Gramza
the facts de novo. The trial court denied the motion to suppress primarily on the grounds of credibility
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19557 - 2017-09-21