Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8181 - 8190 of 30126 for consulta de causas.
Search results 8181 - 8190 of 30126 for consulta de causas.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for reconsideration raised a new issue is a question of law, which we review de novo. See State v. Edwards, 2003 WI
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=660646 - 2023-05-31
for reconsideration raised a new issue is a question of law, which we review de novo. See State v. Edwards, 2003 WI
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=660646 - 2023-05-31
[PDF]
State v. Joseph L. Egerson
we review de novo. See State v. Krier, 165 Wis.2d 673, 676, 478 N.W.2d 63, 65 (Ct. App. 1991
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13606 - 2017-09-21
we review de novo. See State v. Krier, 165 Wis.2d 673, 676, 478 N.W.2d 63, 65 (Ct. App. 1991
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13606 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Richard J. Nichols v. Patrick J. Conlin
Statutes. We therefore reject Nichols’s contentions. Nichols contends that Green County has de facto
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9786 - 2017-09-19
Statutes. We therefore reject Nichols’s contentions. Nichols contends that Green County has de facto
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9786 - 2017-09-19
State v. Alexis C.
; however, we review de novo a trial court’s conclusion whether a stop and search complied with the Fourth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2489 - 2005-03-31
; however, we review de novo a trial court’s conclusion whether a stop and search complied with the Fourth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2489 - 2005-03-31
Lillian Dallman v. Theodore Pyke, Jr.
. Personal jurisdiction is a question of law, which we review de novo. Marsh v. Farm Bureau Mut. Ins. Co
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10484 - 2005-03-31
. Personal jurisdiction is a question of law, which we review de novo. Marsh v. Farm Bureau Mut. Ins. Co
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10484 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
is subject to de novo review. ¶9 Under Wis. Stat. § 973.048(1m), a sentencing court may order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32539 - 2008-04-29
is subject to de novo review. ¶9 Under Wis. Stat. § 973.048(1m), a sentencing court may order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32539 - 2008-04-29
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, 704 N.W.2d 324. We review de novo whether a No. 2020AP1327-CR 3 defendant has been
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=436084 - 2021-10-06
, 704 N.W.2d 324. We review de novo whether a No. 2020AP1327-CR 3 defendant has been
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=436084 - 2021-10-06
State v. Johnny L. White
is a question of constitutional fact which we review de novo. See id. The constitutional right to present
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11473 - 2005-03-31
is a question of constitutional fact which we review de novo. See id. The constitutional right to present
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11473 - 2005-03-31
State v. Perry H. Hollis
conduct amounted to ineffective assistance is a question of law which we review de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11774 - 2011-09-27
conduct amounted to ineffective assistance is a question of law which we review de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11774 - 2011-09-27
COURT OF APPEALS
Buoscio timely filed a motion for relief from judgment under Wis. Stat. § 806.07, and for de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147222 - 2015-08-30
Buoscio timely filed a motion for relief from judgment under Wis. Stat. § 806.07, and for de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147222 - 2015-08-30