Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8191 - 8200 of 63734 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 8191 - 8200 of 63734 for Motion for joint custody.
[MS WORD]
JD-1746: Dispositional Order - Protection or Services (Chapter 938)
)/guardian, and the transfer of legal custody is necessary. |_| 6. Restitution
/formdisplay/JD-1746.doc?formNumber=JD-1746&formType=Form&formatId=1&language=en - 2024-01-08
)/guardian, and the transfer of legal custody is necessary. |_| 6. Restitution
/formdisplay/JD-1746.doc?formNumber=JD-1746&formType=Form&formatId=1&language=en - 2024-01-08
[PDF]
NOTICE
. § 767.41(5)(am) provides: [I]n determining legal custody and periods of physical placement, the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33343 - 2014-09-15
. § 767.41(5)(am) provides: [I]n determining legal custody and periods of physical placement, the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33343 - 2014-09-15
Michelle Wood v. Phillip J. DeHahn
legal custody of their two minor children. DeHahn is a member of the Church of Latter Day Saints
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11871 - 2005-03-31
legal custody of their two minor children. DeHahn is a member of the Church of Latter Day Saints
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11871 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
, this is not the same as the best interest standard in family court with respect to custody where both parties go
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36792 - 2014-09-15
, this is not the same as the best interest standard in family court with respect to custody where both parties go
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36792 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
¶1 Brennan, J. 1 J.P. appeals the trial court’s denial of his suppression motion as well
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218492 - 2018-09-05
¶1 Brennan, J. 1 J.P. appeals the trial court’s denial of his suppression motion as well
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218492 - 2018-09-05
MCI Telecommunications Corporation v. The State of Wisconsin
" statute, and from an order denying their motion for reconsideration.[1] The PSC concluded that MCI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8857 - 2005-03-31
" statute, and from an order denying their motion for reconsideration.[1] The PSC concluded that MCI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8857 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
court held a joint evidentiary hearing on the refusal and a suppression motion in the OWI case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88676 - 2014-09-15
court held a joint evidentiary hearing on the refusal and a suppression motion in the OWI case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88676 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
MCI Telecommunications Corporation v. The State of Wisconsin
an order denying their No. 95-0915 -2- motion for reconsideration.1 The PSC concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8857 - 2017-09-19
an order denying their No. 95-0915 -2- motion for reconsideration.1 The PSC concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8857 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
orders denying his postconviction motion and a reconsideration motion. Appellate counsel, Urszula
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219871 - 2018-09-24
orders denying his postconviction motion and a reconsideration motion. Appellate counsel, Urszula
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219871 - 2018-09-24
James W. Foseid v. State Bank of Cross Plains
conclude that the trial court did not apply correct legal standards in ruling on the postverdict motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7798 - 2005-03-31
conclude that the trial court did not apply correct legal standards in ruling on the postverdict motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7798 - 2005-03-31