Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8221 - 8230 of 66473 for motion to dismiss.
Search results 8221 - 8230 of 66473 for motion to dismiss.
[PDF]
County of Portage v. William R. Konopacky
Konopacky moved to dismiss the complaint and the trial court treated the motion as one for summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5795 - 2017-09-19
Konopacky moved to dismiss the complaint and the trial court treated the motion as one for summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5795 - 2017-09-19
Lee v. ROI Investments
in attorney’s fees, and dismissed ROI’s legal malpractice counterclaim. The issues are whether the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14856 - 2005-03-31
in attorney’s fees, and dismissed ROI’s legal malpractice counterclaim. The issues are whether the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14856 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of property overassessment. Having changed the claim for relief, the court then dismissed the action
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60862 - 2011-03-08
of property overassessment. Having changed the claim for relief, the court then dismissed the action
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60862 - 2011-03-08
Max Gendelman v. Armando Gollaz
denied Gollaz’s motion to dismiss. It rejected his argument that Gendelman and Gourley’s March agreement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11663 - 2013-01-14
denied Gollaz’s motion to dismiss. It rejected his argument that Gendelman and Gourley’s March agreement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11663 - 2013-01-14
COURT OF APPEALS
)” (2011-12).[1] ¶5 The DOT filed a motion for summary judgment against both Hack-A-Way
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100523 - 2013-08-07
)” (2011-12).[1] ¶5 The DOT filed a motion for summary judgment against both Hack-A-Way
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100523 - 2013-08-07
[PDF]
Douglas Dietzen v. Diane Hardt
affidavits to its motion to dismiss, and the trial court did not exclude them, we treat the State's motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8124 - 2017-09-19
affidavits to its motion to dismiss, and the trial court did not exclude them, we treat the State's motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8124 - 2017-09-19
2010 WI APP 139
, and the trial court’s final “order” states that it is granting the DOT’s motion and dismissing the complaint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54202 - 2011-08-21
, and the trial court’s final “order” states that it is granting the DOT’s motion and dismissing the complaint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54202 - 2011-08-21
[PDF]
Ann Lee Bogan v. Price County
to Schnell under § 302.38(1), STATS.2 The County brought a motion for dismissal or, in the alternative
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13625 - 2017-09-21
to Schnell under § 302.38(1), STATS.2 The County brought a motion for dismissal or, in the alternative
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13625 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 139
be granted, and the trial court’s final “order” states that it is granting the DOT’s motion and dismissing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54202 - 2014-09-15
be granted, and the trial court’s final “order” states that it is granting the DOT’s motion and dismissing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54202 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
Oraco, Inc., Oraco, Inc. d/b/a Satellite TV, and American Family brought motions for summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30193 - 2007-09-10
Oraco, Inc., Oraco, Inc. d/b/a Satellite TV, and American Family brought motions for summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30193 - 2007-09-10