Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8311 - 8320 of 69000 for did.
Search results 8311 - 8320 of 69000 for did.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Even if we assume, without deciding, that Niemczyk did provide proper notice of a motion for default
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135721 - 2017-09-21
. Even if we assume, without deciding, that Niemczyk did provide proper notice of a motion for default
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135721 - 2017-09-21
State v. Robert A. Lohmeier
served his first weekend in custody, jail officials told him not to come back because they did not know
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2166 - 2005-03-31
served his first weekend in custody, jail officials told him not to come back because they did not know
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2166 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was recommended in the PSI, and the State did so. The State did not breach the plea agreement when it argued
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1119758 - 2026-05-21
was recommended in the PSI, and the State did so. The State did not breach the plea agreement when it argued
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1119758 - 2026-05-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. We conclude that the circuit court did not misuse its discretion when it denied the § 974.06 motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173495 - 2017-09-21
. We conclude that the circuit court did not misuse its discretion when it denied the § 974.06 motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173495 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
its discretion in awarding Lamb attorney’s fees because: (1) the circuit court did not adequately
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112784 - 2014-05-27
its discretion in awarding Lamb attorney’s fees because: (1) the circuit court did not adequately
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112784 - 2014-05-27
[PDF]
State v. Jesse Rodgers
modification based on a new factor. Because the trial court did not erroneously exercise its sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11061 - 2017-09-19
modification based on a new factor. Because the trial court did not erroneously exercise its sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11061 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
did not mention the prosecutor’s “rape” comment or the prosecutor’s statement about Krubert’s lack
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=850299 - 2024-09-18
did not mention the prosecutor’s “rape” comment or the prosecutor’s statement about Krubert’s lack
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=850299 - 2024-09-18
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the Willans’ petition, and the Board did not proceed on an incorrect theory of law. ¶5 Another component
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=881492 - 2024-11-27
the Willans’ petition, and the Board did not proceed on an incorrect theory of law. ¶5 Another component
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=881492 - 2024-11-27
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
because they’re broken off.” On cross-examination, the victim stated that she did not report any dental
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=305616 - 2020-11-19
because they’re broken off.” On cross-examination, the victim stated that she did not report any dental
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=305616 - 2020-11-19
State v. Anthony Doral Williams
that Williams was not guilty. The juror, however, did not testify that she would have said “no” if asked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10341 - 2005-03-31
that Williams was not guilty. The juror, however, did not testify that she would have said “no” if asked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10341 - 2005-03-31