Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8321 - 8330 of 12796 for se.

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 14, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of A...
to be frivolous, it is frivolous per se on appeal. Id. There is no question, then, that Griswold’s appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104347 - 2013-11-13

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
Mae Krause-Kapalczynski, pro se, appeals from two circuit court orders related to the enforcement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=952535 - 2025-05-07

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 20, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court o...
. Before Wedemeyer, P.J., Fine and Curley, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Jumar K. Jones appeals, pro se
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28502 - 2007-03-19

[PDF] NOTICE
the administrator’s decision and denied the petition. Thomas then filed, pro se, an appeal to this court, and we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33658 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
Brown, C.J., Reilly and Gundrum, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Brian and Kathleen Henson appeal pro se from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143087 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. Demetrius Boyd, pro se, appeals from the circuit court’s order denying his WIS. STAT. § 974.06 (2015-16
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191662 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
Martin previously raised the same issue in a pro se motion that was denied by the Honorable Frederick C
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=201534 - 2017-11-06

COURT OF APPEALS
In March 2007, Dawn filed a pro se “emergency motion for nunc pro tunc order to vacate.” The motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33329 - 2008-07-14

COURT OF APPEALS
and Brennan, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Anne O’Connor, pro se, appeals a judgment in favor of Gimbel, Reilly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88254 - 2012-10-15

City of Madison v. Vincent N. Spruill, Jr.
depending on the road situation and the frequency. Movement within one lane is not a per se violation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6810 - 2005-03-31