Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8401 - 8410 of 63679 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 8401 - 8410 of 63679 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
postconviction motion for a new trial. No. 2017AP2520-CR 2 ¶2 At the time of Benford’s trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237875 - 2019-03-26
postconviction motion for a new trial. No. 2017AP2520-CR 2 ¶2 At the time of Benford’s trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237875 - 2019-03-26
State v. Linda D.
discretion when it denied her motion to dismiss on the basis that the Department of Human Services had lost
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13896 - 2005-03-31
discretion when it denied her motion to dismiss on the basis that the Department of Human Services had lost
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13896 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Linda D.
erroneously exercised its discretion when it denied her motion to dismiss on the basis that the Department
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13896 - 2014-09-15
erroneously exercised its discretion when it denied her motion to dismiss on the basis that the Department
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13896 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
the motion, explaining that the fact that Williams was in custody for part of the period of the charged
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97633 - 2014-09-15
the motion, explaining that the fact that Williams was in custody for part of the period of the charged
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97633 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Peter Galowski v. Stephen Puckett
that the trial court erred by denying his motion for costs as the prevailing party. We disagree, and therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6300 - 2017-09-19
that the trial court erred by denying his motion for costs as the prevailing party. We disagree, and therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6300 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Peter Galowski v. Stephen Puckett
that the trial court erred by denying his motion for costs as the prevailing party. We disagree, and therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6439 - 2017-09-19
that the trial court erred by denying his motion for costs as the prevailing party. We disagree, and therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6439 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. was taken into protective custody shortly after her birth in February 2020 due to substance exposure. She
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=538498 - 2022-06-29
. was taken into protective custody shortly after her birth in February 2020 due to substance exposure. She
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=538498 - 2022-06-29
[PDF]
State v. Tara B.
. SUNDBY, J. On February 27, 1996, this court entered an order granting Tara B.'s motion for stay
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10447 - 2017-09-20
. SUNDBY, J. On February 27, 1996, this court entered an order granting Tara B.'s motion for stay
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10447 - 2017-09-20
Peter Galowski v. Stephen Puckett
also contends that the trial court erred by denying his motion for costs as the prevailing party. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6300 - 2005-03-31
also contends that the trial court erred by denying his motion for costs as the prevailing party. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6300 - 2005-03-31
Peter Galowski v. Stephen Puckett
also contends that the trial court erred by denying his motion for costs as the prevailing party. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6439 - 2005-03-31
also contends that the trial court erred by denying his motion for costs as the prevailing party. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6439 - 2005-03-31