Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8441 - 8450 of 9865 for WA 08.

[PDF] WI 105
under Wis. Stat. § 174.02 (2007-08)2 at the time of the dog bite incident. According to the circuit
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45181 - 2014-09-15

Frontsheet
, No. 2009AP538, unpublished slip op. (Wis. Ct. App. Mar. 24, 2010). [2] See Wis. Stat. § 218.0171 (2007-08
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=67711 - 2011-07-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
Statutes are to the 2007-08 version unless otherwise noted. We note that the 2005-06 version of each
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35808 - 2018-03-07

COURT OF APPEALS
fact and that party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Wis. Stat. § 802.08(2) (2007-08).[3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51319 - 2010-06-23

Frontsheet
, that is, that she was not a statutory owner of the dog under Wis. Stat. § 174.02 (2007-08)[2] at the time of the dog
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45181 - 2010-04-04

[PDF] NOTICE
). No. 2009AP1359 6 party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. WIS. STAT. § 802.08(2) (2007- 08).3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51319 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] WI App 67
not make any findings under WIS. STAT. § 91.77 (2007-08), a predecessor to the current version
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=863234 - 2025-02-18

Frontsheet
admissible under Wis. Stat. § 906.07 (2007-08)[5] and Wis. Stat. § 906.08(2).[6] Furthermore, he argued
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63221 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
respectfully concur. 2017-09-21T17:12:08-0500 CCAP
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=124837 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] WI App 59
in part; reversed in part and cause remanded. 2018-08-23T10:15:47-0500 CCAP
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194452 - 2018-08-23