Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8481 - 8490 of 66083 for motion to dismiss.
Search results 8481 - 8490 of 66083 for motion to dismiss.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
denying his “motion for sentencing modification.” Walker contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74185 - 2014-09-15
denying his “motion for sentencing modification.” Walker contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74185 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
CURIAM. Ray Fredric Werns appeals from postconviction orders summarily denying his motions for a new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29701 - 2014-09-15
CURIAM. Ray Fredric Werns appeals from postconviction orders summarily denying his motions for a new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29701 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
to make a meritless motion for dismissal. See State v. Poellinger, 153 Wis. 2d 493, 506-07, 451 N.W.2d
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94476 - 2013-03-20
to make a meritless motion for dismissal. See State v. Poellinger, 153 Wis. 2d 493, 506-07, 451 N.W.2d
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94476 - 2013-03-20
COURT OF APPEALS
, appeals from an order denying his “motion for sentencing modification.” Walker contends that sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74185 - 2011-11-21
, appeals from an order denying his “motion for sentencing modification.” Walker contends that sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74185 - 2011-11-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
No. 2015AP1867-CR 2 postconviction motion for plea withdrawal. For the reasons discussed below, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175101 - 2017-09-21
No. 2015AP1867-CR 2 postconviction motion for plea withdrawal. For the reasons discussed below, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175101 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Douglas County v. Michael R.L.
in the petition were true. Michael then filed a written motion to dismiss. ¶5 The parties argued that motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7666 - 2017-09-19
in the petition were true. Michael then filed a written motion to dismiss. ¶5 The parties argued that motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7666 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
a circuit court order granting Kimberly Tuescher’s motion for summary judgment and dismissing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=998886 - 2025-08-21
a circuit court order granting Kimberly Tuescher’s motion for summary judgment and dismissing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=998886 - 2025-08-21
COURT OF APPEALS
and the dismissal of his ICRS complaint. Soto filed several motions challenging the contents of the certified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132602 - 2015-01-07
and the dismissal of his ICRS complaint. Soto filed several motions challenging the contents of the certified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132602 - 2015-01-07
[PDF]
NOTICE
in their bankruptcy case. ¶6 The circuit court denied the Kruegers’ motion to dismiss and denied Stitgen’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39342 - 2014-09-15
in their bankruptcy case. ¶6 The circuit court denied the Kruegers’ motion to dismiss and denied Stitgen’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39342 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
court for certiorari review of the administrative confinement decision and the dismissal of his ICRS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132602 - 2017-09-21
court for certiorari review of the administrative confinement decision and the dismissal of his ICRS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132602 - 2017-09-21