Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 851 - 860 of 58312 for speedy trial.
Search results 851 - 860 of 58312 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for the entry into J.H. and D.H.’s home. Montriel declined the offer and made a speedy trial demand
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=725430 - 2023-11-02
for the entry into J.H. and D.H.’s home. Montriel declined the offer and made a speedy trial demand
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=725430 - 2023-11-02
Frederick Lee Pharm v. Byran Bartow
that speedy and efficient prosecution may be had of the indictment, information or complaint ….” Nevada
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19706 - 2005-10-27
that speedy and efficient prosecution may be had of the indictment, information or complaint ….” Nevada
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19706 - 2005-10-27
[PDF]
Frederick Lee Pharm v. Byran Bartow
] hereby offers to deliver temporary custody … in order that speedy and efficient prosecution may be had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19706 - 2017-09-21
] hereby offers to deliver temporary custody … in order that speedy and efficient prosecution may be had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19706 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
speedy trial right; the trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction, erred by denying a motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144260 - 2017-09-21
speedy trial right; the trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction, erred by denying a motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144260 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a continuance, but for Stewart’s speedy trial demand. Because Stewart was offered the option of delaying
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162567 - 2017-09-21
a continuance, but for Stewart’s speedy trial demand. Because Stewart was offered the option of delaying
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162567 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
right to a speedy trial had been violated. See State v. Morris, No. 2000AP310-CR, unpublished slip op
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74543 - 2014-09-15
right to a speedy trial had been violated. See State v. Morris, No. 2000AP310-CR, unpublished slip op
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74543 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
noted on the State’s witness lists. Three months after the request and 19 days before the jury trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=983337 - 2025-07-16
noted on the State’s witness lists. Three months after the request and 19 days before the jury trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=983337 - 2025-07-16
COURT OF APPEALS
appealed, represented by counsel, arguing that his right to a speedy trial had been violated. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74543 - 2011-11-30
appealed, represented by counsel, arguing that his right to a speedy trial had been violated. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74543 - 2011-11-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
with Lee because Lee could prove he was in prison and not in the Green Bay area; (3) a speedy trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=150572 - 2017-09-21
with Lee because Lee could prove he was in prison and not in the Green Bay area; (3) a speedy trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=150572 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
noted on the State’s witness lists. Three months after the request and 19 days before the jury trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=983337 - 2025-07-16
noted on the State’s witness lists. Three months after the request and 19 days before the jury trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=983337 - 2025-07-16