Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8521 - 8530 of 68989 for did.
Search results 8521 - 8530 of 68989 for did.
COURT OF APPEALS
probation. Brown claims that: (1) the Division of Hearings and Appeals did not have jurisdiction to revoke
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31046 - 2007-12-03
probation. Brown claims that: (1) the Division of Hearings and Appeals did not have jurisdiction to revoke
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31046 - 2007-12-03
[PDF]
State v. Michael A. Simmons
this court concludes that Simmons’ actions did not knowingly violate the injunction’s requirement “to avoid
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5489 - 2017-09-19
this court concludes that Simmons’ actions did not knowingly violate the injunction’s requirement “to avoid
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5489 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
previously—but asserted that he did so “inadequately.” ¶5 The postconviction court denied Miller’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108849 - 2017-09-21
previously—but asserted that he did so “inadequately.” ¶5 The postconviction court denied Miller’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108849 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
did not receive a copy of the statements in the CHIPS petition as mandated by statute, the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242461 - 2019-06-25
did not receive a copy of the statements in the CHIPS petition as mandated by statute, the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242461 - 2019-06-25
La Crosse County Department of Human Services v. Sara M.
theories: (1) that the County did not comply with the statutory requirements for timely filing permanency
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13583 - 2005-03-31
theories: (1) that the County did not comply with the statutory requirements for timely filing permanency
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13583 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Salaam directed Domine to conduct an investigative stop of a parked vehicle on 34th Street that did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=247727 - 2019-10-01
Salaam directed Domine to conduct an investigative stop of a parked vehicle on 34th Street that did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=247727 - 2019-10-01
[PDF]
NOTICE
in Beard’s death. Perkins maintained that he did not fire the shot that killed Beard, but Perkins admitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=40469 - 2014-09-15
in Beard’s death. Perkins maintained that he did not fire the shot that killed Beard, but Perkins admitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=40469 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
argues that the circuit court erred when it did not amend the jury’s verdict, that the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=64767 - 2014-09-15
argues that the circuit court erred when it did not amend the jury’s verdict, that the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=64767 - 2014-09-15
Joseph Jackson v.
he did not earn. The referee recommended further that if at the end of the period of suspension
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17387 - 2005-03-31
he did not earn. The referee recommended further that if at the end of the period of suspension
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17387 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
void a recorded affidavit in which Springdale stated that it did not recognize the validity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29934 - 2007-08-08
void a recorded affidavit in which Springdale stated that it did not recognize the validity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29934 - 2007-08-08