Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8591 - 8600 of 11853 for affidavit.
Search results 8591 - 8600 of 11853 for affidavit.
[PDF]
Norman L. Zimdars v. Margaret A. VanCleave
that Van Cleave did not properly set forth all of her allegations in her initial motion and affidavit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5948 - 2017-09-19
that Van Cleave did not properly set forth all of her allegations in her initial motion and affidavit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5948 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
in the warrant affidavit, and if the allegedly false statement is necessary to the finding of probable cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49227 - 2010-04-21
in the warrant affidavit, and if the allegedly false statement is necessary to the finding of probable cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49227 - 2010-04-21
[PDF]
State v. William D. Taylor
the circumstances set forth in the affidavit before him [or her], including the ‘veracity’ and ‘basis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3823 - 2017-09-20
the circumstances set forth in the affidavit before him [or her], including the ‘veracity’ and ‘basis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3823 - 2017-09-20
Adolph F. Cebula v. Thomas Cotter
affidavits and discovery excerpts. Cotter essentially asked the court to dismiss the case because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2635 - 2005-03-31
affidavits and discovery excerpts. Cotter essentially asked the court to dismiss the case because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2635 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Curtis L. Levy, Jr.
did not indicate in his testimony at trial, or in an affidavit in his postconviction motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17649 - 2017-09-21
did not indicate in his testimony at trial, or in an affidavit in his postconviction motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17649 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Paul L. Vogel
” or “no contest.” He did not file an affidavit in support of his motion and did not testify at the hearing when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14683 - 2017-09-21
” or “no contest.” He did not file an affidavit in support of his motion and did not testify at the hearing when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14683 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
] The motion was supported by an affidavit of Rupert’s attorney which recited this history and further stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28857 - 2007-05-01
] The motion was supported by an affidavit of Rupert’s attorney which recited this history and further stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28857 - 2007-05-01
09AP2918-CR State v. Dale W. Jenkins
by an evidentiary affidavit based upon an affiant’s personal knowledge. Nelson v. State, 54 Wis. 2d 489, 497-98
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49944 - 2010-05-18
by an evidentiary affidavit based upon an affiant’s personal knowledge. Nelson v. State, 54 Wis. 2d 489, 497-98
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49944 - 2010-05-18
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
4 In his affidavit accompanying his motion, Castillo Lira averred that “at no time did anyone
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1129415 - 2026-06-11
4 In his affidavit accompanying his motion, Castillo Lira averred that “at no time did anyone
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1129415 - 2026-06-11
State v. Timothy L. Kaelin
.” Second, the affidavit in support of the motion refers to the identification made by the “witnesses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8017 - 2005-03-31
.” Second, the affidavit in support of the motion refers to the identification made by the “witnesses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8017 - 2005-03-31