Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 85941 - 85950 of 87367 for affidavit of filing.
Search results 85941 - 85950 of 87367 for affidavit of filing.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the evidence presented at the hearing. Hayes affirmed the ALJ’s determination. Woodland, pro se, then filed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=356702 - 2021-04-20
of the evidence presented at the hearing. Hayes affirmed the ALJ’s determination. Woodland, pro se, then filed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=356702 - 2021-04-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
are straightforward and adequately supported by the record. Perry has opted against filing a reply brief
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=256750 - 2020-03-17
are straightforward and adequately supported by the record. Perry has opted against filing a reply brief
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=256750 - 2020-03-17
[PDF]
James R. Griffin v. V & J Foods, Inc.
NOTICE A party may file with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9053 - 2017-09-19
NOTICE A party may file with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9053 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Catina A. McCoy
NOTICE A party may file with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10784 - 2017-09-20
NOTICE A party may file with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10784 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. William Oscar Marquis
A party may file with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10103 - 2017-09-19
A party may file with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10103 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
filed a postconviction motion for a new trial. He alleged that trial counsel were ineffective because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=670114 - 2023-06-20
filed a postconviction motion for a new trial. He alleged that trial counsel were ineffective because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=670114 - 2023-06-20
State v. Gary Rach
, 1996 NOTICE A party may file with the Supreme Court a petition to review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9860 - 2005-03-31
, 1996 NOTICE A party may file with the Supreme Court a petition to review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9860 - 2005-03-31
State v. Debra Kerkman
NOTICE A party may file with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8818 - 2005-03-31
NOTICE A party may file with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8818 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not file a reply brief in this case and thus fails to present any response to the State’s analysis
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=661120 - 2023-05-25
not file a reply brief in this case and thus fails to present any response to the State’s analysis
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=661120 - 2023-05-25
[PDF]
Bernice Spiegelberg v. State
AND DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS. FILED NOV 9, 2005 Cornelia
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20161 - 2017-09-21
AND DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS. FILED NOV 9, 2005 Cornelia
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20161 - 2017-09-21