Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8641 - 8650 of 57196 for id.

State v. Ralph E. Adams
counsel’s performance was deficient and that it resulted in prejudice to his defense. See id. In reviewing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12710 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
the trial court erred in dismissing the plaintiff’s action for a mandatory injunction. Id. at 346
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68252 - 2011-07-18

wi app 6 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2013AP147 Complete Title of C...
are usually given their common, ordinary, and accepted meaning. Id. “[S]tatutory language is interpreted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104991 - 2014-02-17

State v. Jene R. Bodoh
of the legislature. Reimann, 214 Wis. 2d at 613. We rely foremost on the plain language of the statute. Id
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17214 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
, such as exigent circumstances or consent to enter.” Id. No. 2009AP127-CR 5 ¶9 At issue in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39232 - 2014-09-15

Predco, Inc v. First Bank Southeast, N.A.
to the rights, or "steps into the shoes," of the party who was paid. Id. at 444, 360 N.W.2d at 36. The purpose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8459 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] WI App 65
or which might have been litigated in the former proceedings.” Id., ¶22 (citations omitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=63042 - 2014-09-15

John A. Balcerzak v. Board of Fire and Police Commissioners for the City of Milwaukee
, and have been summarized in many cases. See, e.g., id. at 315 (setting out the “standard methodology which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14599 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
bias reveals a “great risk of actual bias.” Id., ¶23. ¶11 We presume that a judge has acted fairly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190182 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Sandra L. Shirk v. Bowling, Inc.
will not reverse a circuit court's decision unless the court erroneously exercised its discretion. Id. 6
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17466 - 2017-09-21