Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8691 - 8700 of 63665 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 8691 - 8700 of 63665 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
Mark J. Santner v. David H. Schwarz
rights were violated because too many days elapsed between the time he was taken into custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3489 - 2017-09-20
rights were violated because too many days elapsed between the time he was taken into custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3489 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
of prison proceedings related to eligibility for programming and parole, and custody classifications.[2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111433 - 2014-05-05
of prison proceedings related to eligibility for programming and parole, and custody classifications.[2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111433 - 2014-05-05
Mark J. Santner v. David H. Schwarz
the time he was taken into custody and the time his revocation hearing was held. Due process requires
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3489 - 2005-03-31
the time he was taken into custody and the time his revocation hearing was held. Due process requires
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3489 - 2005-03-31
Brown County Department of Human Services v. John S.
there was insufficient evidence to support a finding that continued custody of Sapatis by John would likely result
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25954 - 2010-05-17
there was insufficient evidence to support a finding that continued custody of Sapatis by John would likely result
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25954 - 2010-05-17
[PDF]
Brown County Department of Human Services v. John S.
a finding that continued custody of Sapatis by John would likely result in serious emotional or physical
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25954 - 2017-09-21
a finding that continued custody of Sapatis by John would likely result in serious emotional or physical
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25954 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
that the defendant was being detained and that this was essentially a custodial interrogation. She did not feel like
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131932 - 2014-12-22
that the defendant was being detained and that this was essentially a custodial interrogation. She did not feel like
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131932 - 2014-12-22
[PDF]
State v. Harold Merryfield
there may be a different recommendation.” The proceedings concluded with no motion by the State nor order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13905 - 2014-09-15
there may be a different recommendation.” The proceedings concluded with no motion by the State nor order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13905 - 2014-09-15
State v. Roger P. Barber
court denied Barber’s motion to dismiss, which was based on a violation of the constitutional guarantee
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11894 - 2005-03-31
court denied Barber’s motion to dismiss, which was based on a violation of the constitutional guarantee
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11894 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Harold Merryfield
there may be a different recommendation.” The proceedings concluded with no motion by the State nor order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13907 - 2014-09-15
there may be a different recommendation.” The proceedings concluded with no motion by the State nor order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13907 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Roger P. Barber
, the trial court denied Barber’s motion to dismiss, which was based on a violation of the constitutional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11894 - 2017-09-21
, the trial court denied Barber’s motion to dismiss, which was based on a violation of the constitutional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11894 - 2017-09-21