Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 871 - 880 of 59393 for quit claim deed.
Search results 871 - 880 of 59393 for quit claim deed.
William Ellingsworth v. Frederick Swiggum
' claim to replace the pier. The Ellingsworths argue, and the trial court agreed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7954 - 2005-03-31
' claim to replace the pier. The Ellingsworths argue, and the trial court agreed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7954 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the Coreys1 declaratory judgment. The Rofferses claim a forty-foot wide ingress/egress easement on land
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=273511 - 2020-07-29
the Coreys1 declaratory judgment. The Rofferses claim a forty-foot wide ingress/egress easement on land
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=273511 - 2020-07-29
[PDF]
William Ellingsworth v. Frederick Swiggum
) placed and maintained the pier. The statute, then, provides no basis for the Ellingsworths' claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7954 - 2017-09-19
) placed and maintained the pier. The statute, then, provides no basis for the Ellingsworths' claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7954 - 2017-09-19
Eddie D. Cannon v. State
of property. He claims that the trial court erred in denying his motions. Because the trial court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8639 - 2005-03-31
of property. He claims that the trial court erred in denying his motions. Because the trial court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8639 - 2005-03-31
Eddie D. Cannon v. State
of property. He claims that the trial court erred in denying his motions. Because the trial court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8640 - 2005-03-31
of property. He claims that the trial court erred in denying his motions. Because the trial court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8640 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, the transfer of the property to Colten by quitclaim deed did not extinguish the claim that Historic Hudson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81888 - 2014-09-15
, the transfer of the property to Colten by quitclaim deed did not extinguish the claim that Historic Hudson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81888 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
.” In other words, the transfer of the property to Colten by quitclaim deed did not extinguish the claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81888 - 2012-03-31
.” In other words, the transfer of the property to Colten by quitclaim deed did not extinguish the claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81888 - 2012-03-31
[PDF]
Approval Date: 05/28/2020 Page 1
Certified copy or a duplicate original may be recorded in the register of deed’s office
/formdisplay/PR-1827_summary.pdf?formNumber=PR-1827&formType=Summary&formatId=2&language=en - 2020-07-02
Certified copy or a duplicate original may be recorded in the register of deed’s office
/formdisplay/PR-1827_summary.pdf?formNumber=PR-1827&formType=Summary&formatId=2&language=en - 2020-07-02
[PDF]
Form Summary
to petitioner. The clerk is required to transmit the certified copy of the order to the Register of Deeds
/formdisplay/CV-471_summary.pdf?formNumber=CV-471&formType=Summary&formatId=2&language=en - 2022-07-13
to petitioner. The clerk is required to transmit the certified copy of the order to the Register of Deeds
/formdisplay/CV-471_summary.pdf?formNumber=CV-471&formType=Summary&formatId=2&language=en - 2022-07-13
Frontsheet
full interest in those properties. She further argues that the court's conclusion that the deeds
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32801 - 2008-06-29
full interest in those properties. She further argues that the court's conclusion that the deeds
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32801 - 2008-06-29