Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8731 - 8740 of 29996 for consulta de causas.

[PDF] Edwin C. West v. Byran Bartow
interpretation. Statutory interpretation is a question of law that we review de novo. State ex rel. Cramer v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3821 - 2017-09-20

Marino Construction Co., Inc. v. City of Milwaukee
statements made by their agent or employee is a question of law that we review de novo. See Snow v. Koeppl
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7899 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
standard under WIS. ADMIN. CODE § NR 10.07(2)(b)5. presents a question of law this court reviews de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50176 - 2014-09-15

Ray A. Peterson v. Mark Baker
complaint. Peterson demanded a trial de novo, and a trial to the circuit court was scheduled for July 19
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5501 - 2005-03-31

State v. Phillip C. Ziegler
this court decides de novo. See id. at 634. ANALYSIS Newly Discovered Evidence ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15987 - 2005-03-31

State v. Tracy A. Kiefer
. The application of a statute to a particular set of facts is a question of law, which we review de novo. DOR v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10776 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
review the sufficiency of a postconviction motion to warrant a hearing de novo, based on the four
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35190 - 2014-09-15

State v. Sylvia's Eagle Express, Inc.
of constitutional law which we review de novo. State v. Guzman, 166 Wis. 2d 577, 586, 480 N.W.2d 446 (1992
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4872 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
Danielle Baudhuin Tierney Electronic Notice Peter J. Long 1761 W. Butte Des Morts Beach Rd
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1027277 - 2025-10-22

State v. Javier Belmontes
to the effective assistance of counsel is ultimately a legal determination, which this court decides de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15433 - 2005-03-31