Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8731 - 8740 of 30126 for consulta de causas.
Search results 8731 - 8740 of 30126 for consulta de causas.
[PDF]
State v. Anthony J. Dentici
, 53 (1996). Whether a defendant does so is a question of law that we review de novo. See id., 201
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16070 - 2017-09-21
, 53 (1996). Whether a defendant does so is a question of law that we review de novo. See id., 201
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16070 - 2017-09-21
State v. Allan P. Nelson
for our de novo review. Rochelt, 165 Wis.2d at 379, 477 N.W.2d at 661. We conclude that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10219 - 2005-03-31
for our de novo review. Rochelt, 165 Wis.2d at 379, 477 N.W.2d at 661. We conclude that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10219 - 2005-03-31
Jeffrey Plummer v. State
, the court is not called upon to weigh the evidence; certiorari is not a de novo review. The inquiry
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8113 - 2005-03-31
, the court is not called upon to weigh the evidence; certiorari is not a de novo review. The inquiry
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8113 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
David K. Kalan v. Bockhorst
. II. DISCUSSION We review summary judgments de novo, employing the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14372 - 2014-09-15
. II. DISCUSSION We review summary judgments de novo, employing the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14372 - 2014-09-15
Tony G. Merriweather v. Gerald Berge
confinement. ¶5 On certiorari review, we determine de novo whether the agency making
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5830 - 2005-03-31
confinement. ¶5 On certiorari review, we determine de novo whether the agency making
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5830 - 2005-03-31
Ray A. Peterson v. Regina K. Buie
an order of the circuit court for Dane County: ROBERT a. DE CHAMBEAU, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5044 - 2005-03-31
an order of the circuit court for Dane County: ROBERT a. DE CHAMBEAU, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5044 - 2005-03-31
September Table of Unpublished Opinions
08-02-2005 Reversed and remanded 2005AP000604 City of De Pere v. Jesse J. Oskey
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19835 - 2005-10-02
08-02-2005 Reversed and remanded 2005AP000604 City of De Pere v. Jesse J. Oskey
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19835 - 2005-10-02
COURT OF APPEALS
of an ordinance and a state statute, both of which we review de novo. State v. Ozaukee Cnty. Bd. of Adj., 152 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143903 - 2015-07-06
of an ordinance and a state statute, both of which we review de novo. State v. Ozaukee Cnty. Bd. of Adj., 152 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143903 - 2015-07-06
COURT OF APPEALS
for Waukesha County: linda m. van de water, Judge. Affirmed. Before Brown, C.J., Neubauer, P.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68247 - 2011-07-19
for Waukesha County: linda m. van de water, Judge. Affirmed. Before Brown, C.J., Neubauer, P.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68247 - 2011-07-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
de novo.” Waukesha Cty. v. J.W.J., 2017 WI 57, ¶15, 375 Wis. 2d 542, 895 N.W.2d 783 (citations
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=272004 - 2020-07-23
de novo.” Waukesha Cty. v. J.W.J., 2017 WI 57, ¶15, 375 Wis. 2d 542, 895 N.W.2d 783 (citations
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=272004 - 2020-07-23