Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8761 - 8770 of 83278 for case search.
Search results 8761 - 8770 of 83278 for case search.
State v. Ralanda Nicole Lee
the apartment and searched it because the officers “had already established that was the crime scene and Ms. Lee
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11879 - 2005-03-31
the apartment and searched it because the officers “had already established that was the crime scene and Ms. Lee
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11879 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Randolph O. Neumeyer
to conduct a pat down search and handcuff Neumeyer for the short drive to the gas station. Neumeyer did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4900 - 2017-09-19
to conduct a pat down search and handcuff Neumeyer for the short drive to the gas station. Neumeyer did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4900 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Bruce A. Kassube
2003 WI App 64 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 02-2334-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5613 - 2017-09-19
2003 WI App 64 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 02-2334-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5613 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Michael J. Forster
2003 WI App 29 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 02-0602-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5005 - 2017-09-19
2003 WI App 29 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 02-0602-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5005 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Johnny Lacy
the circuit court should have suppressed the DNA evidence because the search warrant seeking a sample
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16081 - 2017-09-21
the circuit court should have suppressed the DNA evidence because the search warrant seeking a sample
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16081 - 2017-09-21
State v. Johnny Lacy
have suppressed the DNA evidence because the search warrant seeking a sample of Lacy’s blood
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16081 - 2005-03-31
have suppressed the DNA evidence because the search warrant seeking a sample of Lacy’s blood
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16081 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Frontsheet
2021 WI 50 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2019AP435-CR COMPLETE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=373919 - 2021-08-02
2021 WI 50 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2019AP435-CR COMPLETE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=373919 - 2021-08-02
[PDF]
Frontsheet
2020 WI 87 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2020AP131-D COMPLETE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=308126 - 2020-11-24
2020 WI 87 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2020AP131-D COMPLETE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=308126 - 2020-11-24
[PDF]
WI App 74
2020 WI App 74 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=294064 - 2020-12-08
2020 WI App 74 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=294064 - 2020-12-08
[PDF]
NOTICE
was an intrusion but it was not an unreasonable intrusion. The court reasoned that “this is a case where if Mr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31015 - 2014-09-15
was an intrusion but it was not an unreasonable intrusion. The court reasoned that “this is a case where if Mr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31015 - 2014-09-15