Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8771 - 8780 of 30126 for consulta de causas.

[PDF] Mark Olsen v. Edward Hoffmann
affirm. ¶4 We review the grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7189 - 2017-09-20

State v. Alice Faye Howard
counsel's performance was deficient, and, if so, whether it was prejudicial, are legal issues we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13286 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Gil Jensen v. Mary Beschta-Bachman
to be more credible. In essence, Bachman asks us to conduct a de novo review of the circuit court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4865 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Peter D. Wicker
with the trial court’s assessment that the de minimis conflict in testimony did not rise to the level so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20040 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Nora A. Cadotte
of fact unless they are clearly erroneous and independently apply the law to those facts de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7210 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] CA Blank Order
that this court reviews de novo.” State v. Edwards, 2003 WI 68, ¶7, 262 Wis. 2d 448, 665 N.W.2d 136. Because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=804071 - 2024-05-21

[PDF] Ray A. Peterson v. Regina K. Buie
-RESPONDENT. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Dane County: ROBERT A. DE CHAMBEAU
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5044 - 2017-09-19

CA Blank Order
court’s grant of summary judgment de novo, and we apply the same methodology employed by the circuit court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141127 - 2015-05-05

State v. Michael Gisvold
. The issue whether the officer had probable cause is a question of law that this court reviews de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13451 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Karl Meyer
the application of the statute to undisputed facts, this court reviews the trial court’s order de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10583 - 2017-09-20