Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8801 - 8810 of 16449 for commentating.

COURT OF APPEALS
did allude to the defendant’s reluctance to testify, that came about as a result of a brief comment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76315 - 2012-01-10

2010 WI APP 50
“cooperation in stating your reasons or comments as to why this request should be either approved or denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46960 - 2010-04-25

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of the witness while not at the same time making comments about the veracity of the witness’s testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=639381 - 2023-03-30

State v. John W. Knoppe
at the suppression hearing was Luhman. In making the findings of fact, the trial court started by commenting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13304 - 2005-03-31

State v. Jesse J. C.
to arrive. [2] The trial court excluded Joy’s actual comments to Laura as hearsay, but admitted Laura’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2743 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] FORM SUMMARY
declaration). Comments: The prison litigation law (1997 Wisconsin Act 133), which became effective
/formdisplay/CV-439_summary.pdf?formNumber=CV-439&formType=Summary&formatId=2&language=en - 2025-03-31

[PDF] State v. James H.
that the trial court made the above-quoted remark at the beginning of its oral decision. If that comment were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4965 - 2017-09-19

CA Blank Order
2502 (comment). Even if the jury was not supposed to consider the attempted sexual assault conviction
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134234 - 2015-02-02

CA Blank Order
738 (Ct. App. 1984). The record shows that Mikkelson was afforded an opportunity to comment on the PSI
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109866 - 2014-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 30, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court...
was not aggravated. He maintained that the circuit court’s sentencing comments did not support imposition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27928 - 2007-01-29