Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8851 - 8860 of 16505 for commenting.

COURT OF APPEALS
, supports the sentence imposed on this defendant. The defendant’s motion referenced the Court’s comments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31883 - 2008-02-26

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. And, it is readily apparent that the detective is not commenting on the truthfulness of the particular victim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74295 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] WI App 164
comments and our due process concern, we glean that post-trial means as early as “immediately after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34178 - 2014-09-15

2010 WI APP 50
“cooperation in stating your reasons or comments as to why this request should be either approved or denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46960 - 2010-04-25

[PDF] State v. Tracy D. Reynolds
the results of the field sobriety tests. A footnote in Swanson commented: Unexplained erratic driving
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11491 - 2017-09-19

State v. David J.M.
comment. By the Court.—Order affirmed. This opinion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13881 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Linda J.
planning.” With respect to (f), the trial court commented: “a more stable and permanent family
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12554 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
. App. 1998) (a prosecutor may remark on the credibility of witnesses as long as the comment is based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106737 - 2014-01-14

State v. Bernhardt C. Thompson
transcript shows that the trial court started by commenting on Thompson’s character and his long criminal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15442 - 2005-03-31

State v. Allen D. Mechtel
that Edberg's comment that she had been to Mechtel's house did not imply that she had been in Mechtel's house
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8252 - 2005-03-31