Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8851 - 8860 of 19940 for site:courtlistener.com/docket/ 1983 "(D. Ariz.)".
Search results 8851 - 8860 of 19940 for site:courtlistener.com/docket/ 1983 "(D. Ariz.)".
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, 749-50, 595 N.W.2d 635 (1999), and “to control its docket with economy of time and effort.” Rupert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=697504 - 2023-08-31
, 749-50, 595 N.W.2d 635 (1999), and “to control its docket with economy of time and effort.” Rupert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=697504 - 2023-08-31
COURT OF APPEALS
in the record and our review of the docket in that case did not reveal any connection to Silverstein’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75132 - 2012-01-22
in the record and our review of the docket in that case did not reveal any connection to Silverstein’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75132 - 2012-01-22
[PDF]
State v. Jonathan P. Cole
with a judge.” Section 968.04(1)(a), STATS. The case record and judgment docket contains the entry “date
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13217 - 2017-09-21
with a judge.” Section 968.04(1)(a), STATS. The case record and judgment docket contains the entry “date
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13217 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
. The circuit court docket entries do not indicate that Judge Mawdsley held a hearing or otherwise took evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46214 - 2010-01-26
. The circuit court docket entries do not indicate that Judge Mawdsley held a hearing or otherwise took evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46214 - 2010-01-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
entry in the case docket sheet dated January 13, 2016, states that three questions were received from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209233 - 2018-03-06
entry in the case docket sheet dated January 13, 2016, states that three questions were received from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209233 - 2018-03-06
_WISCONSIN COURT OF APPEALS
preclusion, issue preclusion or law of the case. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(3) (2011-12). Docket
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121944 - 2014-09-15
preclusion, issue preclusion or law of the case. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(3) (2011-12). Docket
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121944 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and control its docket when faced with frivolous or repetitive litigation. State v. Casteel, 2001 WI App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1068424 - 2026-01-27
and control its docket when faced with frivolous or repetitive litigation. State v. Casteel, 2001 WI App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1068424 - 2026-01-27
[PDF]
NOTICE
in the action and a default judgment was docketed on June 30, 2005. On July 21, 2005, Weichman, represented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28331 - 2014-09-15
in the action and a default judgment was docketed on June 30, 2005. On July 21, 2005, Weichman, represented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28331 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
improperly altered is incorrect. The circuit court’s online docket entries (CCAP) currently show that Witz
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105735 - 2013-12-12
improperly altered is incorrect. The circuit court’s online docket entries (CCAP) currently show that Witz
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105735 - 2013-12-12
COURT OF APPEALS
docket entries: “Jury question received, answered, and filed.” She also was able to obtain the jury’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42498 - 2009-10-21
docket entries: “Jury question received, answered, and filed.” She also was able to obtain the jury’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42498 - 2009-10-21