Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8871 - 8880 of 68502 for did.
Search results 8871 - 8880 of 68502 for did.
[PDF]
State v. Greg A. Groesbeck
of cars at a high speed ….” At that time, Potter noted the license plate number of the vehicle. He did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4700 - 2017-09-19
of cars at a high speed ….” At that time, Potter noted the license plate number of the vehicle. He did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4700 - 2017-09-19
State v. Alfred L. Davenport, Jr.
to suppress. Because the trial court did not err in denying Davenport's suppression motion, we affirm.[1] I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10645 - 2005-03-31
to suppress. Because the trial court did not err in denying Davenport's suppression motion, we affirm.[1] I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10645 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that Susan Nelson (a.k.a. Susan Soerens) joins in this appeal, however, she did not appeal the circuit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174055 - 2017-09-19
that Susan Nelson (a.k.a. Susan Soerens) joins in this appeal, however, she did not appeal the circuit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174055 - 2017-09-19
Board of Attorneys Professional Responsibility v. James A. Beau
therein was true and correct. Although the client did not herself enter the date she had signed
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16939 - 2005-03-31
therein was true and correct. Although the client did not herself enter the date she had signed
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16939 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Tommy Donnell Forrest
received a letter from Forrest that he did not want to have counsel withdraw from this appeal, wanted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20237 - 2017-09-21
received a letter from Forrest that he did not want to have counsel withdraw from this appeal, wanted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20237 - 2017-09-21
Dane County v. Lee R.
that Lee R. did not evince a substantial probability of physical harm to others is clearly erroneous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13822 - 2005-03-31
that Lee R. did not evince a substantial probability of physical harm to others is clearly erroneous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13822 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Dane County v. Lee R.
) the trial court’s finding that Lee R. did not evince a substantial probability of physical harm to others
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13822 - 2014-09-15
) the trial court’s finding that Lee R. did not evince a substantial probability of physical harm to others
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13822 - 2014-09-15
State v. Marty S. Madeiros
) constitutes double jeopardy and a violation of his due process rights. Because Madeiros did not move
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3069 - 2005-03-31
) constitutes double jeopardy and a violation of his due process rights. Because Madeiros did not move
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3069 - 2005-03-31
State v. Ruven Seibert
who prepared the predisposition report had testified on behalf of the State at trial and did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10511 - 2005-03-31
who prepared the predisposition report had testified on behalf of the State at trial and did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10511 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Darla J.S. v. Jesus G.
did not erroneously exercise its discretion, we affirm. Jesus appeared pro se at a 1991 paternity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11927 - 2017-09-21
did not erroneously exercise its discretion, we affirm. Jesus appeared pro se at a 1991 paternity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11927 - 2017-09-21