Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8881 - 8890 of 83958 for simple case search.
Search results 8881 - 8890 of 83958 for simple case search.
[PDF]
“Aftercare, relapse prevention and continuing care”: Applying research findings to practice
access additional services when/as needed; Develop a simple and short instrument for drug court
/courts/programs/problemsolving/docs/aftercarerelapseprevention.pdf - 2021-09-23
access additional services when/as needed; Develop a simple and short instrument for drug court
/courts/programs/problemsolving/docs/aftercarerelapseprevention.pdf - 2021-09-23
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. WIS. STAT. § 802.08(2) (2019-20). “To make a prima facie case for summary judgment, a moving
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=374645 - 2021-06-08
. WIS. STAT. § 802.08(2) (2019-20). “To make a prima facie case for summary judgment, a moving
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=374645 - 2021-06-08
[PDF]
Roberta L. Gorenstein v. Ralph G. Gorenstein
4 In 1996 alone, 3,628 cases were filed in our 16-judge court. This figure does not include
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12300 - 2017-09-21
4 In 1996 alone, 3,628 cases were filed in our 16-judge court. This figure does not include
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12300 - 2017-09-21
Roberta L. Gorenstein v. Ralph G. Gorenstein
that the trial court erroneously awarded compound instead of simple interest. This argument is not accompanied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12300 - 2005-03-31
that the trial court erroneously awarded compound instead of simple interest. This argument is not accompanied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12300 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Tawana D. Reed
. 1 This case is decided by one judge pursuant to § 752.31(2)(f), STATS. No. 97-0472-CR 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12096 - 2017-09-21
. 1 This case is decided by one judge pursuant to § 752.31(2)(f), STATS. No. 97-0472-CR 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12096 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
-incrimination under the United States and Wisconsin Constitutions; (8) the search warrant issued
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=113858 - 2017-09-21
-incrimination under the United States and Wisconsin Constitutions; (8) the search warrant issued
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=113858 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
-incrimination under the United States and Wisconsin Constitutions; (8) the search warrant issued by a court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113858 - 2014-06-09
-incrimination under the United States and Wisconsin Constitutions; (8) the search warrant issued by a court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113858 - 2014-06-09
[PDF]
NOTICE
pursuant to a search warrant because the officers violated the “knock-and-announce” rule and failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30944 - 2014-09-15
pursuant to a search warrant because the officers violated the “knock-and-announce” rule and failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30944 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
and the contents of a computer seized pursuant to a search warrant because the officers violated the “knock
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30944 - 2007-11-20
and the contents of a computer seized pursuant to a search warrant because the officers violated the “knock
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30944 - 2007-11-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a defect in the plea colloquy. In this case, May’s postconviction motion contained both Bentley
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237642 - 2019-03-20
a defect in the plea colloquy. In this case, May’s postconviction motion contained both Bentley
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237642 - 2019-03-20